I've just realised that all the traffic for this thread was actually
in juju-dev,
so I'll revert to there. Another cross post then, my apologies.
On 7 November 2013 09:21, roger peppe wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 20:07, Kapil Thangavelu
> wrote:
>> instead of adding more complexity and concepts,
On 6 November 2013 20:07, Kapil Thangavelu
wrote:
> instead of adding more complexity and concepts, it would be ideal if we
> could reuse the primitives we already have. ie juju environments have three
> user exposed services, that users can add-unit / remove-unit etc. they have
> a juju prefix a
+1 (million), this solution keeps coming up, and I still feel it is
the right one.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:49 AM, roger peppe wrote:
>>
>> The current plan is to have a single "juju ensure-ha-state" juju
>> command. This would crea
Oops, missed the end of a thought there. If we get to the point of needing
more than 12 server nodes (not unfathomable), then we have to start doing
some more work for our "hyperscale" customers, which will probably involve
much more customization and require much more knowledge of the system.
I
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:49 AM, roger peppe wrote:
> The current plan is to have a single "juju ensure-ha-state" juju
> command. This would create new state server machines if there are less
> than the required number (currently 3).
>
> Taking that as given, I'm wondering what we should do
> in t
The answer to "how does the user know how to X?" is the same as it always
has been. Documentation. Now, that's not to say that we still don't need
to do some work to make it intuitive... but I think that for something that
is complicated like HA, leaning on documentation a little more is ok.
Mor
just my tuppence...
Would it not be clearer to add an additional command to implement your
proposal? E.g. "add-manager" and possibly "destroy/remove-manager"
This could also support switches for later fine control, and possibly
be less open to misinterpretation than overloading the add-machine
com
