Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Simon Davy
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:51 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> On 24/02/17 11:30, Andrew Wilkins wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM Adam Collard >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:07 Adam Is

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:51 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 24/02/17 11:30, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM Adam Collard > wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:07 Adam Israel > wrote: > > Thanks for calling this out, Simon! We should be shouting this from the > rooft

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 24/02/17 11:30, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM Adam Collard > mailto:adam.coll...@canonical.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:07 Adam Israel > mailto:adam.isr...@canonical.com>> wrote: > > Thanks for calling this out, Simon! We should be shouting

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:15 PM Adam Collard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:07 Adam Israel > wrote: > > Thanks for calling this out, Simon! We should be shouting this from the > rooftops and celebrating in the streets. > > > Only if you also wave a big WARNING banner! > > I can definitely se

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Adam Collard
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:07 Adam Israel wrote: > Thanks for calling this out, Simon! We should be shouting this from the > rooftops and celebrating in the streets. > Only if you also wave a big WARNING banner! I can definitely see value in pre-installing a bunch of things in your LXD images as

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-24 Thread Adam Israel
Thanks for calling this out, Simon! We should be shouting this from the rooftops and celebrating in the streets. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:42 AM Stuart Bishop wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 23:20, Simon Davy wrote: > > > One thing that seems to have landed in 2.1, which is worth noting IMO, is

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-23 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 23 February 2017 at 23:20, Simon Davy wrote: > One thing that seems to have landed in 2.1, which is worth noting IMO, is > the local juju lxd image aliases. > > tl;dr: juju 2.1 now looks for the lxd image alias juju/$series/$arch in the > local lxd server, and uses that if it finds it. > > Thi

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-23 Thread Simon Davy
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical < cur...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here! > > > ## What's new in 2.1.0 > > - Model migration > - Interactive `add-cloud` > - Networking changes > -

Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-22 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
A new release of Juju, 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here! ## What's new in 2.1.0 - Model migration - Interactive `add-cloud` - Networking changes - Conjure-up - LXD credential changes - Changes to the GUI - Instrumentation of Juju via Prometheus endpoints - Improved OpenStack keysto