Re: Juju 2.x bootstrap on LXD broken (regular bridge, no NAT)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:54 AM John Meinel wrote: > For your workaround, where does spec.Endpoint get filled in? By the user > as part of bootstrap-contraints? or by juju as a default value? I don't see > anything in your patch, which sounds like you would have to do: >

Re: Juju 2.x bootstrap on LXD broken (regular bridge, no NAT)

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:54 PM Toubeau, Anthony wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to bring to your attention a currently broken bootstrapping > scenario: > Local deployment through LXD using a standard bridge instead of the usual > LXD provided lxdbr0. > > As a