Re: No icon = no promulgation?

2014-08-14 Thread Matt Bruzek
Hello José, Thanks for sending this email out. Your commitment to the Juju community is pretty impressive. What you did not mention in your email is the reason you were subscribed to this bug is because you performed a community review of this charm for us. That is something I really

Re: No icon = no promulgation?

2014-08-14 Thread Richard Harding
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, José Antonio Rey wrote: Hello, As I am subscribed to all bugs in Juju (as some of you may also be), today I got an email from a CakePHP charm review. On this one, a charmer had to reject the submission because, when promulgating, the tool runs `charm proof` to make sure

Re: No icon = no promulgation?

2014-08-14 Thread José Antonio Rey
On Aug 14, 2014 12:24 PM, Richard Harding rick.hard...@canonical.com wrote: I'd suggest to work with the author to use either the default charm icon or a category icon and move the charm forward. As far as I know, the default category icon is applied when no icon is available. On the other

Re: No icon = no promulgation?

2014-08-14 Thread Sebastian
Something to think, if we want to deliver quality experience to our users, details such the icon will impact aggressively. So yes, for me as a user and charm developer, having an icon was one of the first things I did, and wasn't all that difficult, it's well documented and material design (the

No icon = no promulgation?

2014-08-13 Thread José Antonio Rey
Hello, As I am subscribed to all bugs in Juju (as some of you may also be), today I got an email from a CakePHP charm review. On this one, a charmer had to reject the submission because, when promulgating, the tool runs `charm proof` to make sure things are not broken, not promulgating if any