Re: [Review Queue] hpcc charm

2014-08-27 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 27/08/14 00:10, Matt Bruzek wrote: First and most importantly the hpcc charm deploys according to the readme file! I had to increase the memory constraints on the HP-cloud to 4GB per machine (juju set-constraints mem=4GB) so all the services had enough memory to start up. After that I was

Re: [Review Queue] hpcc charm

2014-08-27 Thread José Antonio Rey
It is a nice idea, but it should definitely fire up a warning saying that the machine will have larger specs, as well as asking for confirmation. I don't want to see any surprise charges in my AWS bills! On 08/27/2014 02:34 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: On 27/08/14 00:10, Matt Bruzek wrote:

Re: [Review Queue] hpcc charm

2014-08-27 Thread Matt Bruzek
I am tentatively +1 for adding some charm metadata for minimum requirements for the charm. We could certainly add that kind of information in the README but having it in the metadata would make it automatic (magic). José makes a great point about how something like this could increase the cloud

Re: [Review Queue] hpcc charm

2014-08-26 Thread Sameer Zeidat
About immutable configuration parameters. IMHO it'd make a better user experience if juju added support for them. It's understandable that the desire is for juju to be a full 'life-cycle' management interface for the services it deploys, from deployment to operations and all the way to