On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Simon Davy bloodearn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 September 2014 15:40, Matt Bruzek matthew.bru...@canonical.com
wrote:
José
I just had a conversation about that with the Ecosystems team. You are
correct, the revision file in the charm directory is no longer
On 8 September 2014 16:10, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
you need to keep in mind the revision file will never match a local charm
version in the state server (it will at min be at least one higher than
that). This goes back to removing the need for users to manage the
On 8 September 2014 22:00, Simon Davy bloodearn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 September 2014 15:40, Matt Bruzek matthew.bru...@canonical.com wrote:
José
I just had a conversation about that with the Ecosystems team. You are
correct, the revision file in the charm directory is no longer used and