Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the pointer and help debugging.
Created https://github.com/juju-solutions/bigtop/issues/49 with hook errors.
Cheers,
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Kevin Monroe wrote:
> Hey Guillermo,
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Guillermo Gonzalez
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri
W.r.t. the naming of charms, I think it's cumbersome to use
'apache-spark' when 'spark' would do just fine.
Let's aim for the shortest commonly-disambiguated name for charms. This
may be a good opportunity to get it right for the new wave of big data
charms.
I would expect bundles to have riche
Hey Guillermo,
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Guillermo Gonzalez <
guillermo.gonza...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Monroe
> wrote:
> > Hey Juju,
> >
> > TL;DR: i'm proposing to un-promulgate 45 outdated big data
> charms/bundles
> > [0] next Friday, Ma
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Monroe
wrote:
> Hey Juju,
>
> TL;DR: i'm proposing to un-promulgate 45 outdated big data charms/bundles
> [0] next Friday, May 5th.
>
> Earlier this week, Merlijn mentioned improvements that would help users
> searching for things like 'hadoop'. The gi
+1 from me.
Quality and community is what makes charms and bundles shine, this is a
good move to keep the best breed.
++
Sam
On Apr 29, 2017 01:34, "Kevin Monroe" wrote:
> Hey Juju,
>
> TL;DR: i'm proposing to un-promulgate 45 outdated big data charms/bundles
> [0] next Friday, May 5th.
>
> E
Hey Juju,
TL;DR: i'm proposing to un-promulgate 45 outdated big data charms/bundles
[0] next Friday, May 5th.
Earlier this week, Merlijn mentioned improvements that would help users
searching for things like 'hadoop'. The gist is that we still list
outdated charms as 'recommended', even though
