Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2017-01-04 Thread roger peppe
On 4 January 2017 at 15:34, roger peppe wrote: > a dep option I meant to say "a deploy option" here. -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2017-01-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 04/01/17 10:55, Stuart Bishop wrote: > > > On 3 January 2017 at 19:07, Rick Harding > wrote: > > I'm looking into this. The bundle deploy feature in Juju 2.0 does > not allow referring to existing machines because it

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2017-01-04 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 3 January 2017 at 19:07, Rick Harding wrote: > I'm looking into this. The bundle deploy feature in Juju 2.0 does not > allow referring to existing machines because it breaks the reusability of > the bundle. > It would be great if Juju started supporting

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines

2017-01-03 Thread Nate Finch
FWIW, I think this *could* work, but it may be that we just haven't coded it up. Just as *juju deploy mysql -n 4* will use existing clean machines in the model where appropriate, deploying a bundle should as well (presuming the existing machines match constraints etc as usual). On Tue, Jan 3,

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines

2017-01-03 Thread Rick Harding
Hi Vance, you can deploy a bundle that uses existing machines in the model with the juju-deployer [1] tool. The built in juju deploy method is the first stage in a generic tool and does not allow pointing at existing machines because it means the bundles are not sharable and that you need your

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2017-01-03 Thread Rick Harding
> To: Vance Morris/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS > From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> > Date: 12/29/2016 11:09AM > Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> > Subject: Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux) > > Sorry, didn't see

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2017-01-02 Thread Adam Stokes
s here... Thanks, Vance -Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: - To: Vance Morris/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> Date: 12/29/2016 11:09AM Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: using a b

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-30 Thread Vance Morris
rec...@gmail.com> wrote: - To: Vance Morris/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> Date: 12/29/2016 11:09AM Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux) Sorry, didn't

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-29 Thread Vance Morris
Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: - To: Vance Morris/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> Date: 12/29/2016 11:09AM Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: using a bundle with manually added machine

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-29 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
e: - > To: Vance Morris/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS > From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> > Date: 12/29/2016 08:33AM > Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> > Subject: Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux) > > Definin

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-29 Thread Vance Morris
Dallas/IBM@IBMUS From: Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> Date: 12/29/2016 08:33AM Cc: "juju@lists.ubuntu.com" <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux) Defining the machines and defining the correct machines

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-29 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
Defining the machines and defining the correct machines for each application using `to` should work. The error message looks like some applications don't define machines so juju tries to create new machines which obviously fails. Is it possible to share the bundle that produces this error message

using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

2016-12-29 Thread Vance Morris
Whoops, sorry for that last message -- let's try this again! Hi all, Is it possible to use a bundle.yaml in conjunction with manually added machines? $ juju version 2.0.2-xenial-s390x $ juju status << snip >> Machine StateDNS Inst id Series AZ 0started REDACTED

using a bundle with manually added machines

2016-12-29 Thread Vance Morris
Hi all,   Is it possible to use a bundle.yaml in conjunction with manually added machines?   $ juju version2.0.2-xenial-s390x   $ juju status << snip >> Machine  State    DNS  Inst id  Series  AZ0    started  REDACTED  manual:REDACTED   xenial  1    started  REDACTED