Hi Merljin,
It indeed is a bug. I'm working on a fix for that. I just landed but I'll post
an example workaround tonight, when I get home.
Adam
On Mar 28, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Merlijn Sebrechts merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com
wrote:
I put the question on askubuntu:
Hi,
Thanks for the useful feedback on docs! I agree that good examples for
Python and the charm helpers are things that are sorely missing, and
we will address that soon.
I don't want to burden you further, but would you mind if I emailed
you some questions about your experience with the
I put the question on askubuntu:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/602527/provide-data-doesnt-send-data-when-required-keys-not-satisfied-juju-charm-usin
tl;dr: You can't seem to use the same relationship class for both
provided_data and required_data...
Am I using this completely the wrong way?
Hi Merlijn,
I posted an example of the workaround I developed this week while
rewriting a charm to use the services framework. I am working on a fix
for the bug, but in the meantime you can use this:
Thanks. :-)
I do hope we can also to get local provider working inside the
container as well, since it will provide a cleaner set of instructions
for new charmers to test their charms, or just play around with Juju.
But the --net=host workaround gives us immediate wins in CI, review,
and
Hi,
The pxe boots seem to work up to a certain point,
I have not set up the ssh public key. How do I
do that?
Is the public key just from the same machine the
superuseradmin was created on?
Im getting a failed to query node BMC. Does a
loopback need to be disabled or something else?
Cheers,
New Charm AppScale.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1424335
The charm overall looked good, and deployed as described. I had a few
small suggestions, however I recommeded this one to be accepted into
the charm store.
New Charm IBM MQ
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1432489
Working
On 27 March 2015 at 23:50, sheila miguez she...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro jo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't do the
local provider.
I definitely appreciate the ability to test something isolated from
