Re: "Designing for Success: Juju and Charm architecture overview" - Juju Charm Summit

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 2:43 AM Marco Ceppi wrote: > Here are my slides from the first session on Thursday morning. It's a > meant to be an overview of the Juju and Charm architecture. I'm curious on > feedback as it's the first time I've run this style presentation. >

Re: Designing for Success: Juju and Charm architecture overview

+1, great presentation. We should publish this as a post with some wordsmithing + marketing (images). ++ Sam -- Samuel Cozannet Cloud, Big Data and IoT Strategy Team Business Development - Cloud and ISV Ecosystem Changing the Future of Cloud Ubuntu / Canonical UK LTD

Great post about Juju from the Meteorite guys

Sam C was kind enough to point me to this today: https://medium.com/@Meteorite_BI/why-i-like-juju-5cd1c16b33b1 This is what makes Juju so much fun, you can actually see what a difference it's making to people working with big, complex topologies of fast-moving stuff. I care a lot about

Re: Compiling juju on openSUSE

You might even just be able to run the unmodified juju client binary from Ubuntu on OpenSUSE, I believe it's all still statically linked. Mark On 20/09/15 22:39, Herman Bergwerf wrote: > Ok great! > I looked up the source and I think it can be achieved by updating the > juju/juju and the

Re: Downgrade a charm

No problem. Let us know if you hit any other issues. Enjoy Juju! On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Tom Barber wrote: > Hi Rick, > > Spot on thanks, its just a standalone deployment in a shell script so I > just need to pin the version in that. > > Thanks a lot! > > Tom > > On 21 September 2015 at 12:32,

Downgrade a charm

Hi guys I thought this might happen and its quite a large problem so any ideas are greatly appreciated. I redeployed my Hadoop cluster this morning and found that the Spark charm has had its version upgraded from 1.3 to 1.4. SQL in 1.4 has a number of serious bugs and I need to get 1.3 back, can

Reviewed proposals against juju/juju

Hi Please review list of your proposals on RB :D While doing reviews today, I have noticed that we have several reviewed proposals that are older than 2 weeks. Some of these may have a legitimate reason to be this weathered - they are against feature branches or do not have ShipIt... Others

"Evolution of a Charm" presentation from the Charmer Summit

>From the Juju Charmer Summit (Charm Testing session), here are the "Evolution of a Charm" slides. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SRo8_qVM0RqZcK78yzgNcIIPuiSMa_bhSBi4s8Zx72M/pub?start=true=false=3300 TLDR; We describe how we are evolving each of the Ubuntu OpenStack charms over time to

Re: Trying to remove and redeploy quantum-gateway on a different server

On 21/09/15 04:25, Daniel Bidwell wrote: > Does this mean that I can use a local install of landscape and grow it > to more than 10 nodes without getting support for it? I stopped using > landscape because I can't afford to use something that will require > software support when it grows larger