Re: Thank you!

2017-04-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 20/04/17 13:27, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > What about speed an velocity? Does a more focused Canonical mean more > resources for Juju? With good reason the team is unlikely to be comfortable answering your question, but I am happy to do so. Juju is essential to our success with large

Re: Can we do bundle within a bundle?

2017-04-20 Thread fengxia
Thank you for the pointer. I'll take a look. Can it package local charms? On 04/20/2017 03:58 PM, Junaid Ali wrote: Fengxia, juju-deployer could be helpful here to incorporate multiple bundles. Charm-testing repo

Re: Can we do bundle within a bundle?

2017-04-20 Thread Junaid Ali
Fengxia, juju-deployer could be helpful here to incorporate multiple bundles. Charm-testing repo can help you in using juju-deployer

Re: Can we do bundle within a bundle?

2017-04-20 Thread fengxia
If we have a tree hierarchy, three levels, 1,2,3 where lvl 1 is the root. We are thinking to make entity at each level a charm. I can see at level 2 I can create bundles to include level 3 charms, how about level 1 then? What artifact should I use to include bundles in lvl2? On 04/20/2017

Re: Can we do bundle within a bundle?

2017-04-20 Thread Tom Barber
Currently bundles are pretty dumb and nested bundles don't exist. Tom On 20 Apr 2017 20:29, "fengxia" wrote: > We have a design that calls for tree structure of entities, each will be > mapped to a charm/bundle. So how to bundle a list of bundles? > > -- > Feng xia > Engineer

Can we do bundle within a bundle?

2017-04-20 Thread fengxia
We have a design that calls for tree structure of entities, each will be mapped to a charm/bundle. So how to bundle a list of bundles? -- Feng xia Engineer Lenovo USA Phone: 5088011794 fx...@lenovo.com Lenovo.com Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | Blogs | Forums -- Juju mailing list

[Review Queue]: elasticsearch (v5!) and general cleanup

2017-04-20 Thread Kevin Monroe
Hey Juju, I spent some time in the review queue today: - Cleanup - Moved reviews that were awaiting author feedback into “Needs Fixing” - Elasticsearch - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/103?revision=270 - Minor README suggestions -

A+ HTTPS with the SSL termination proxy

2017-04-20 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
Hi all Want to have A+ HTTPS for your juju-managed webservice? Want to secure a webservice with a password? The SSL termination proxy charm to your rescue! It's a reverse proxy that encrypts traffic using a Let's Encrypt certificate

A tutorial introduction to juju charm dev

2017-04-20 Thread Erik Lönroth
Hello! Let me introduce myself to the email list. My name is Erik Lönroth and I work as technical lead on high performance computing at Scania. Scania it a truck manufacturer in europe and part of the Volkswagen group. I'm a strong advocator of the open source culture and my background is in

Re: Juju deploy same application twice, failed "application already exist"

2017-04-20 Thread Adam Collard
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 at 13:39 fengxia wrote: > I c. So I should have used add-unit command instead of "deploy". Is that > right? > Pretty much, but it really depends on your charm. See https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/charms-scaling and

Re: Juju deploy same application twice, failed "application already exist"

2017-04-20 Thread Tom Barber
Sorry, yeah didn't hit reply all! :) Yeah, deploy a service once, add unit for more capacity or HA generally. On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, fengxia wrote: > I c. So I should have used add-unit command instead of "deploy". Is that > right? > > On 04/20/2017 08:34 AM, Tom

Re: Juju deploy same application twice, failed "application already exist"

2017-04-20 Thread fengxia
I c. So I should have used add-unit command instead of "deploy". Is that right? On 04/20/2017 08:34 AM, Tom Barber wrote: You add new "units" so you can run n units of a charm which then can use the internal peer relation to deal with inter-app communications. Tom On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at

Juju deploy same application twice, failed "application already exist"

2017-04-20 Thread fengxia
Hi, I have developed a charm called "test". Using command line to deploy from local repo: $ juju deploy $JUJU_REPOSITORY/trusty/test First one went well. Issuing this command again will give error: 08:28:49 ERROR cmd supercommand.go:460 cannot add application "test": application already

Re: Thank you!

2017-04-20 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
What about speed an velocity? Does a more focused Canonical mean more resources for Juju? -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Thank you!

2017-04-20 Thread Rick Harding
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:08 AM Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Any official word on what this will mean for Juju? > The changes you hear about don't change the direction of Juju. We're still focused on building a great platform for modeling and solving the software

Re: Thank you!

2017-04-20 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
A very big +1 Any official word on what this will mean for Juju? 2017-04-20 12:43 GMT+02:00 Tom Barber : > I'll probably get whipped for doing this as its been playing on my mind > and I feel it needs doing. > > Hopefully those who have left the company in the last few weeks

Thank you!

2017-04-20 Thread Tom Barber
I'll probably get whipped for doing this as its been playing on my mind and I feel it needs doing. Hopefully those who have left the company in the last few weeks haven't completely left this list, I'd just like to send out a heartfelt thank you on behalf of the community and juju users, to the