Re: juju enable-ha with lxd servers

Are these 3 LXD containers on one machine, or 3 different host machines where you want to run LXD containers? At present we don't support scheduling across LXD hosts, so the easier way would probably be to treat 3 host machines as separate 'manually provisioned' machines, and then deploy to

Re: Is it possible to return management to Juju after manual provision of a machine?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:39 AM N. S. wrote: > Hi, > > Excuse me if this seems a strange scenario. > > My scenario is as follows: > > I have a charm that has lots of problems in its install script, needs > massive change (NOT SURE how to fix it) > > So, > > I added an empty

[ANN] Virtual Docs Sprint - The charms.reactive framework - on 30 June 2017

Hi all, Our second Virtual Docs Sprint is tomorrow from 18-19:00 GMT (14-15:00 EDT). This will be a bi-weekly event where developers and users of Juju can get together to work on documentation for it's related projects. When: Jun 30th, at 18:00 GMT (14:00 EDT) Where:

[ANN] Virtual Docs Sprint - The charms.reactive framework - on 30 June 2017

Hi all, Our second Virtual Docs Sprint is tomorrow from 18-19:00 GMT (14-15:00 EDT). This will be a bi-weekly event where developers and users of Juju can get together to work on documentation for it's related projects. When: Jun 30th, at 18:00 GMT (14:00 EDT) Where:

Is it possible to return management to Juju after manual provision of a machine?

Hi, Excuse me if this seems a strange scenario. My scenario is as follows: I have a charm that has lots of problems in its install script, needs massive change (NOT SURE how to fix it) So, I added an empty machine by Juju add-machine --series Xenial And then I logged into it by Juju SSH 9

New release of python-libjuju

The 0.6.0 release of the Python bindings for the Juju API is now available on PyPI. The docs have moved to ReadTheDocs, due to PythonHosted being deprecated, and the change log can be found at: https://pythonlibjuju.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html Here is a synopsis of the recent

Re: Command Completion Not working? --SOLVED

Awesome, glad you got it worked out and things nice and up to date with 2.2 On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:30 PM N. S. wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry > False Alarm. > > There is something wrong , especially that version reads 2.0.2! > > After the refresh of the snap, issue is