Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread John Meinel
I just wanted to note that some of the reason for 128GB was because 2.0 and 2.1 did leak memory over time. And if you have a leak you will always eventually run out. In 2.2 we've fixed all the ones we've found so far and we're actively doing some performance measuring to give better guidelines.

Is a set state called multiple times?

2017-07-26 Thread fengxia
Hi Juju, Once I set a state, set_state("here"), I want to make sure its @when will only be executed ONCE (when "here" from False->True). So my thought is to remove_state("here") in its @when("here") code block. If I don't, will this @when be called multiple times if I don't reset this

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:58:30 +0100 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines > > (e.g. 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't > > be easy for them to have an extra

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:09:14 + Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits > wrote: > > > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use > > MongoDB from snap instead of a deb. This would

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines (e.g. > 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't be easy for > them to have an extra machine to setup a new controller and run model > migration, if their controller is HA

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-26 Thread Ian Booth
On 25/07/17 00:54, Dmitrii Shcherbakov wrote: > Hi Patrizio, > > As far as I understand it now, if you configure it right in terms of > networking, it will be possible for both single and multi-cloud cases. > Correct. You can have one application deployed to a model in a Google cloud, and

Re: CephFS Backend for Hadoop

2017-07-26 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Hi {James, Patrizio}, Be careful with using cephfs in production before ceph Luminous though (RC now). Although cephfs was declared stable in Jewel, http://ceph.com/releases/v10-2-0-jewel-released/ "CephFS: This is the first release in which CephFS is declared stable! Several features are

Re: CephFS Backend for Hadoop

2017-07-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 26/07/17 07:14, Patrizio Bassi wrote: > Deploying hadoop via juju in an openstack tenant requires a separate > model (as far as i could design it). > So we may use the new juju 2.2 cross model relation to relate the > hadoop charms to the openstack ceph units. > > does it sound feasible? Yes,

Re: CephFS Backend for Hadoop

2017-07-26 Thread Patrizio Bassi
Il giorno mer 26 lug 2017 alle 06:28 James Beedy ha scritto: > Hello all, > > I will be evaluating CephFS as a backend for Hadoop over the next few > weeks, probably start investigating how this can be delivered via the > charms in the morning. If anyone has ventured to