I just wanted to note that some of the reason for 128GB was because 2.0 and
2.1 did leak memory over time. And if you have a leak you will always
eventually run out. In 2.2 we've fixed all the ones we've found so far and
we're actively doing some performance measuring to give better guidelines.
Hi Juju,
Once I set a state, set_state("here"), I want to make sure its @when
will only be executed ONCE (when "here" from False->True).
So my thought is to remove_state("here") in its @when("here") code
block. If I don't, will this @when be called multiple times if I don't
reset this
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:58:30 +0100
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote:
> > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines
> > (e.g. 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't
> > be easy for them to have an extra
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:09:14 +
Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits
> wrote:
>
> > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use
> > MongoDB from snap instead of a deb. This would
On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote:
> Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines (e.g.
> 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't be easy for
> them to have an extra machine to setup a new controller and run model
> migration, if their controller is HA
On 25/07/17 00:54, Dmitrii Shcherbakov wrote:
> Hi Patrizio,
>
> As far as I understand it now, if you configure it right in terms of
> networking, it will be possible for both single and multi-cloud cases.
>
Correct. You can have one application deployed to a model in a Google cloud, and
Hi {James, Patrizio},
Be careful with using cephfs in production before ceph Luminous though (RC
now).
Although cephfs was declared stable in Jewel,
http://ceph.com/releases/v10-2-0-jewel-released/
"CephFS:
This is the first release in which CephFS is declared stable! Several
features are
On 26/07/17 07:14, Patrizio Bassi wrote:
> Deploying hadoop via juju in an openstack tenant requires a separate
> model (as far as i could design it).
> So we may use the new juju 2.2 cross model relation to relate the
> hadoop charms to the openstack ceph units.
>
> does it sound feasible?
Yes,
Il giorno mer 26 lug 2017 alle 06:28 James Beedy ha
scritto:
> Hello all,
>
> I will be evaluating CephFS as a backend for Hadoop over the next few
> weeks, probably start investigating how this can be delivered via the
> charms in the morning. If anyone has ventured to