I’ve created this bug for further tracking
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1729127
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:59 PM, James Beedy wrote:
>
> Yes, deploying without —storage results in a successful deploy.
>
>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Ian Booth
I’ve created this bug for further tracking
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1729127
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:59 PM, James Beedy wrote:
>
> Yes, deploying without —storage results in a successful deploy.
>
>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Ian Booth
Yes, deploying without —storage results in a successful deploy.
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
> And just to ask the obvious: deploying without the --storage constraint
> results
> in a successful deploy, albeit to a machine with maybe the wrong
Yes, deploying without —storage results in a successful deploy.
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
> And just to ask the obvious: deploying without the --storage constraint
> results
> in a successful deploy, albeit to a machine with maybe the wrong
And just to ask the obvious: deploying without the --storage constraint results
in a successful deploy, albeit to a machine with maybe the wrong disk?
On 01/11/17 10:51, James Beedy wrote:
> Ian,
>
> So, I think I'm close here.
>
> The filesytem/device layout on my node(s):
And just to ask the obvious: deploying without the --storage constraint results
in a successful deploy, albeit to a machine with maybe the wrong disk?
On 01/11/17 10:51, James Beedy wrote:
> Ian,
>
> So, I think I'm close here.
>
> The filesytem/device layout on my node(s):
Ian,
So, I think I'm close here.
The filesytem/device layout on my node(s): https://imgur.com/a/Nzn2H
I have tagged the md0 device with the tag "raid0", then I have created the
storage pool as you have specified.
`juju create-storage-pool ssd-disks maas tags=raid0`
Then ran the following
Thanks for raising the issue - we'll get the docs updated!
On 01/11/17 07:44, James Beedy wrote:
> I knew it would be something simple and sensible :)
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
>> Of the top of my head, you want to do
Thanks for raising the issue - we'll get the docs updated!
On 01/11/17 07:44, James Beedy wrote:
> I knew it would be something simple and sensible :)
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
>> Of the top of my head, you want to do
I knew it would be something simple and sensible :)
Thank you!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
> Of the top of my head, you want to do something like:
>
> $ juju create-storage-pool ssd-disks maas tags=ssd
> $ juju deploy postgresql --storage
I knew it would be something simple and sensible :)
Thank you!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
> Of the top of my head, you want to do something like:
>
> $ juju create-storage-pool ssd-disks maas tags=ssd
> $ juju deploy postgresql --storage
Of the top of my head, you want to do something like:
$ juju create-storage-pool ssd-disks maas tags=ssd
$ juju deploy postgresql --storage pgdata=ssd-disks,32G
The above assumes you have tagged in MAAS any SSD disks with the "ssd" tag. You
can select whatever criteria you want and whatever tags
Of the top of my head, you want to do something like:
$ juju create-storage-pool ssd-disks maas tags=ssd
$ juju deploy postgresql --storage pgdata=ssd-disks,32G
The above assumes you have tagged in MAAS any SSD disks with the "ssd" tag. You
can select whatever criteria you want and whatever tags
Trying to check out Juju storage capabilities on MAAS I found [0], but
can't quite wrap my head around what the syntax might be to make it work,
and what the extent of the capability of the Juju storage features are when
used with MAAS.
Re-reading [0], and looking for anything else I can find on
Trying to check out Juju storage capabilities on MAAS I found [0], but
can't quite wrap my head around what the syntax might be to make it work,
and what the extent of the capability of the Juju storage features are when
used with MAAS.
Re-reading [0], and looking for anything else I can find on
2017-10-31 14:39 GMT+01:00 fengxia :
we have been using Ansible (called from charm) for executions.
>
- Would you recommend this approach to new users?
- Do you have examples of such Charms?
- Do you have docs detailing the ansible-Juju integration?
- What can we
Merlijn,
Nice summary of these issues. Especially for the #2, we have been using
Ansible (called from charm) for executions. I think there are 3 points
here:
1. confg mgt has solved idempotency, great!
2. many organizations have accumulated an asset of recipes using these
config tools
This is very helpful! Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Wilkins <
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:40 PM Akshat Jiwan Sharma
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andrew. I'm using google cloud platform. But also planning to use
>> aws in the
18 matches
Mail list logo