Re: Docker compose in Juju

Hi Gayan, I've added the general Juju list which covers more of these general topics. So, because of the nature of LXC machines and Docker style application containers it's hard to model that style application container in Juju in the same way LXC machines work. However, it's quite easy to wrap

DevOps Days SLC: Juju, MAAS, & Snaps!

Hey everyone, Jorge Castro and I spent the last two days at DevOps Days Salt Lake City. We were "blue square" sponsors giving us table space and a one minute pitch. This is the first of our “tour de force” for the Juju 2.0 launch and a lot of refinement to the “pitch” and talking points were

Re: "juju attach"

Why not just "add" which is already pretty well used. Throughout the Juju CLI. Marco On Sat, Jun 18, 2016, 5:52 AM roger peppe wrote: > mount ? > > On 18 June 2016 at 09:23, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > > > We can change a CLI until RC, and its good

Re: Does sftp eliminate the need to check sha1sum?

I disagree with the HTTPS comment, since if the certificate is validated by an authority it's reasonable to assert you received it from intended part. If SFTP and checking host keys like SSH should also perform the same function as long as we have the hosts signature. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:56

Re: Does sftp eliminate the need to check sha1sum?

Hey everyone! Wow, great discussion so far. I think it's clear that repeat-ability and reliability is very important and it's something Juju aims to do so we should make sure charms follow suit. As Merlijn and Cory alluded to, this is a pretty temporary problem as in Juju 2.0 we will get

Re: Juju 2.0-beta10 is here!

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:18 PM Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta10 is here! > > ## What's new? > > * Improved handling of LACP bonds > * Continued usability enhancements > * Users can now use `juju relate` to add a relation

Re: relation-* events for subordinate charms

Hi Iain, upgrade-charm is the /right/ step for this, however the problem is that upgrade charm does not explicitly run all the previous hooks (events) that fired. The files and updated hooks will only be run on future hook invocations. What I'd recommend is to abstract the bits that do this

Re: Use of Jujucharms to launch non-opensource code

This is actually a non-issue. The codebase was moved to LGPL over a year ago, there was just two places this was not updated. First LaunchPad and second was the setup.py file. I've corrected both. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:09 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > I'll ta

filesystem type storage backend

block until storage is added? We really want to be able to support the /option/ or adding storage by the operator but we're not sure how this functions. If we use that directory before the operator attaches storage will it be mounted over or migrated? Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju

Re: Spam in logs

ku-reporting-interactive-report-designer/> >> goal, but you can always help by sponsoring the project >> <http://www.meteorite.bi/products/saiku/sponsorship>) >> >> On 12 February 2016 at 14:46, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >> &

Re: Use of Jujucharms to launch non-opensource code

Could you elaborate on your usage? Are you wrapping Juju itself in a commercial project, using the charms in a commercial project, or producing a commercial charm? Either way, IANAL, so my responses would be moot, but I can try to offer some guidance. Marco On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:01 PM

Re: Problems with colocated layered and non-layered Charms

always have to run on a physical machine, hulk-smashed > together with the others.. > > Then there's the use-case of subordinate Charms. I encountered some issues > creating layered subordinate Charms for non-layered Charms. > > > > Kind regards > Merlijn > > > 2016-01-28 13:3

Re: Problems with colocated layered and non-layered Charms

Is this a result of deploy --to ? If so, I expect there to be errors, "hulk smashing" services onto a single machine really isn't expected to work, it just "works" for a few combination of charms. Is there a reason you can't deploy to LXC or KVM containers? The isolation of a LXC

Re: Config Management Camp

A lot of us are here early at FOSDEM, we even have a few talks scheduled in the Config Management dev room on Sunday! We are bright eyed and bushy tailed attending talks today! We'll be ready come Monday and look forward to three great days of talks and conversations! Marco On Sat, Jan 30, 2016

Re: Hooks and interfaces!

Hey Tom, sorry you've hit something that was one of the driving forces behind interface layers - the http interface. It's been a heavily contested and unique interface because it was originally defined as just hostname and port. However, other charms don't agree on this simple implementation and

Re: M4 instances

This was a bug that popped up earlier for me, it was fixed in a 1.X version of Juju I'm surprised to see it rear it's head again :\ On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Tom Barber wrote: > Hello folks > > I dumped it in the ticket but I figured I'll ask here as well, > >

Re: Building from source

This happened to me on the first time. (I too am not a golang hacker, we'll walk through this together). To start, juju doesn't just use the standard golang dep management, so you'll need godeps. I've been doing this to get there: cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/juju/juju JUJU_MAKE_GODEPS=true make

Re: Configuring environments.yaml for lxd

I think LXD is only in 1.26-alpha3 which you can get from ppa:juju/devel On Thu, Jan 21, 2016, 10:30 AM Daniel Bidwell wrote: > I have reinstalled my machine with ubuntu 15.10 to get lxd. I have > juju-1.25.0-wily-amd64. lxc image list images: returns a list of > images

Re: Juju devel 2.0-alpha1 is available for testing

Wow! A lot to play with tomorrow. Thanks for the release core team! On Thu, Jan 21, 2016, 5:06 PM Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > # juju-core 2.0-alpha1 > > A new development release of Juju, juju-core 2.0-alpha1, is now available. > This release replaces version

Re: Regarding Juju Support for IBM SoftLayer

AWS, local, OpenStack, or all the other native providers. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:39 AM Shilpa Kaul <shilk...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have a requirement where I need to deploy a charm on IBM SoftLayer > Cloud. Can we give IBM SoftLayer as a clou

Re: Openstack charms - storage vendors

You have to "charm" that portion up. At the moment we don't have a NetApp cinder backend charm, but we do have some examples of how to implement a cinder backend. One example of this is the cinder-vnx charm ( https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/cinder-vnx/trusty/4) using the latest version of

Re: @when('config.changed')

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:56 PM Matt Bruzek wrote: > I hate to go against the love-in here. While I desperately want a > configuration changed feature for the reactive framework. I disagree with > the way it was implemented. I brought up issues with this

Re: EC2 VPC firewall rules

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:05 AM Tom Barber wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/mysql/+bug/1248812 Clearly not! > Dunno what I was doing last time, local deployment or something. Fork > o'clock. > Local deployments don't have a firewaller which is

Re: juju devel 2.0-beta1 is available for testing

Won't the user be able to create different LXD clouds by specifying a remote LXD host though? On Sun, Feb 21, 2016, 12:19 AM Ian Booth wrote: > The lxd cloud works on Juju 2.0 beta1 out of the box. > > $ juju bootstrap mycontroller lxd > > There is no need to edit any

Proposal: Charm testing for 2.0

rs and feedback from the community at large. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Proposal: Charm testing for 2.0

We leverage the > everloving *stuff* out of Amulet. > We're starting an "Amulet for Juju 2.0" design conversation, feedback from the OpenStack team on pieces missing and what we could move from charmhelpers.contrib.amulet would be great: https://github.com/juju/amulet/issues/116 >

Re: Proposal: Charm testing for 2.0

> -1 to stopping or discouraging individual charm amulet tests >> >> +1 for every charm containing amulet tests >> >> +1 for every charm containing unit tests >> >> +1 for every charm having amulet coverage in at least 1 bundle >> >> +1 for every

Re: Reserved actions

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:49 PM Andrew Wilkins wrote: > Hi, > > There's a code review in progress (http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4286/) that > will introduce a predefined action, "juju-run", which is part of the > replacement for the current SSH-based juju-run. > This

Re: charmstore client authentication(help! :) )

While not an answer, I have some hindsight comments. Of you're going to register a company on Launchpad it'd be best to do as a team instead of a user. That way other users could be added and removed from that team without breakage. Finally, I pointed you to the gh repo to file bugs, building it

Re: Proposal: Charm testing for 2.0

side; is there a good write-up somewhere about charm unit testing. >> I'd like to do this but I'm not sure how to do this. I am completely new to >> unit testing so I'm having a hard time to see how a good unittest for a >> Charm would look like and what exactly should be

Re: Charmers application - David Ames

Well, an outstanding turnout, thank you everyone for your feedback. With more than two +1 from existing charmers welcome thedac! Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM James Page <james.p...@canonical.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 15:37 Chris Glass

Re: New feature for charmers - min-juju-version

I've updated the issue against charm-tools that Ryan opened to clarify that proof should do proper version catching as well https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/141 On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM Rick Harding wrote: > The thought is that we'll update the

upgrade-charm and default configuration values

away with resources in 2.0, but the MySQL is an example that we run into a bit of times when addressing problems in configuration. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Automatic periodic upgrades as part of the base layer

This is definitely more an operator decision than a charm decision. There are two existing charms to address this. An unattended-upgrades charm and landscape-client. Check those out first to see if the fit your needs. Marco On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, 5:16 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:

Re: Juju GUI 2.0

Hi Uros, I've deployed this, but `api-info` isn't a command anymore in 2.0 How do we get the admin-secret/password for the admin (or any) user? Marco On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:03 AM Uros Jovanovic wrote: > Hey Tom. > > You can try the latest in

Re: Juju GUI 2.0

n juju 2.0. > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Uros, >> >> I've deployed this, but `api-info` isn't a command anymore in 2.0 How do >> we get the admin-secret/password for the admin (or any) user? &g

Re: Get number of units

_UNIT_NAME##*/}) ``` So if it's unit/0 you'll get 4000, if it's unit/10 you'll get 4010, etc. Since unit numbers are unique in Juju you'll never get a conflict. Marco Ceppi On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:29 AM Tom Barber <t...@analytical-labs.com> wrote: > Scrap that, I have an a

Charm Community Team Sprint

e a sprint retrospective published Friday with a list of completed and outstanding items. In the meantime, we're happy to take any feedback, questions, or help! Thanks, Marco Ceppi [0]: https://tree.taiga.io/project/marcoceppi-juju-charm-community-sprint-201604/backlog [1]: https://tree.taiga.io/project/

Re: Promulgated charms (production readiness)

I think a layer:nrpe isn't the right choice, but a layer:monitoring might be. Esp with the layer/interface/subordinate model now, it seems that we could actualize an abstract means to declare what to monitor and have nrpe/zabbix-agent/promethous translate that. Marco On Mon, May 16, 2016 at

Re: Introducing a Daily PPA for Juju

As someone who is still supporting a Juju 0.6 environment (I know, I know, but every time I've tried to migrate it to 1.0 it's failed), I appreciate that there's still a 0.6 Stable ppa as I have to install it occasionally. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:19 PM Adam Stokes

Re: Backwards incompatible change to config.changed states

Might I suggest we do a hangout on air so we can record the discussion while skipping the back and forth on the list? Possibly during an office hour? Also, I'm not sure the decision is final and I certainly appreciate your feedback and welcome the continued discussion so we can reach a consensus!

Re: Backwards incompatible change to config.changed states

When would the next office hour be? > > 2016-05-02 23:13 GMT+02:00 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com>: > >> Might I suggest we do a hangout on air so we can record the discussion >> while skipping the back and forth on the list? Possibly during an office >> hour?

[ANN] charm & charm-tools 2.0!

juju@lists.ubuntu.com - report issues against either https://github.com/juju/charm-tools or https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client ask questions in #juju on freenode.net or on https://askubuntu.com Thanks, Marco Ceppi on behalf of the Juju Charm Community Team and UI Engineering Team -- Juju mai

Re: Charm layers & Windows

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, 2:12 AM Andrew Wilkins <andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:30 AM Andrew Wilkins < > andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >> wrote

Re: Bootstrap to a specific series

juju bootstrap aws/us-east-1 --bootstrap-series=trusty That should hold you over while the cloud images are updated! Marco On Thu, Apr 21, 2016, 11:29 AM Ney Moura wrote: > Hey guys! > > I'm currently trying do bootstrap my Juju environment using ec2 but, since > today

Re: Any mentor for adding a new provider available?

Hi Patrik, This would be a great and welcomed addition. I'm adding the juju-dev mailing list to this thread as that is where most the Juju Core development happens. Marco On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, 6:23 AM Patrik Karisch wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to add DigitalOcean as

Re: Juju as a snap

Hopefully the snapcraft.yaml shows up in the repo. We're gearing up to do the same with charm-tools very soon, excited to provide a daily build in edge and proper candidates in candidate channel. I'll mail the list when we make the switch. Marco On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, 5:12 PM Tom Barber

Re: Juju 2.0-beta12 ETA

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:51 PM Cheryl Jennings < cheryl.jenni...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Due to the US holidays and with much of the team at core and networking > sprints, we will be releasing 2.0-beta12 next week. There are currently 6 > assigned critical bugs [0] that need to

Re: Juju 2.0-beta12 ETA

Thanks! On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:43 PM Cheryl Jennings < cheryl.jenni...@canonical.com> wrote: > There are no API changes planned for beta12, but if any do come up, they > will be announced on the mailing lists. > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@c

charm and charm-tools are now snap'd for testing

Hi everyone, In preparation for the next release of charm-tools and charmstore-client we've snap'd up the two making it easier to subscribe to the latest nightly, beta, candidate, and stable releases of the tools. The snap isn't 100% ready yet, but it's confined and operational. I'd like to tap

Re: Request to join ~charmers

I am a +1, I've reviewed a lot of Pete's work and he understands the core principals of charming and will make a fine addition. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:01 AM Pete Vander Giessen < pete.vandergies...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been working with the Big Data team since May 2016,

Re: normal charm to subordinate charm and now peer relation does not work

This is one of the areas we're going to improve with Reactive 2.0, where the relation scope will be obsoleted as it's confusing and doesn't add much value to the overall framework. Updates and plans regarding that will be available soon! Marco On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:40 AM Alex Kavanagh

Re: All our Charms became hidden because we promulgated some

You're not the only one and it's something that's in the works! On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, 08:02 Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > God, I would love to have a "how many charms use this layer" search > function! > > 2017-02-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber : > >

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta17, is here! > > ## What's new? > > * add-model now takes region name as an optional positional argument, >to be consistent with bootstrap. The --region flag has

kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

Hey everyone, I know we've had discussions about this over the past few months, but it seems we have three commands that overlap pretty aggressively. Using Juju beta16, and trying to 'destroy' a controller it looks like this now: ``` root@ubuntu:~# juju help destroy-controller Usage: juju

Deploying Xenial charms in LXD? Read this

I believe these are the two related ones for this problem: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1621229 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1576692 I'll make sure to post an update when this has been resolved. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

Oh my god, how did I miss this! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016, 7:22 PM Andrew Wilkins <andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:26 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < >>

Re: JUJU Charm Certification

juju add-relation cinder san2 Now, you can configure each of the new applications, which are teh same copy of the charm deployed multiple times. This will add a unique backend per charm copy which seems to be your intended use case. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:03 PM

Re: kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

someone without thinking. > What happens if I destroy-controller without that flag? Do I have to go into my cloud portal to kill those instances? Is there any way to recover from that to get juju reconnected? If not, it's just a slower death. > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marco Ceppi <m

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in edge? Marco On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels > (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel

Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to test the latest version with `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate` If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week I'll move what's in candidate to stable. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

Hi Ryan, I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try again? Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: > Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes? I'd like to > validate

charm-helpers 0.9.1

built charm, you will need to run charm build again. There was a problem in the setup.py for the project which excluded a few packages. The project's been updated from distutils to setuptools and future proofed against this problem. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: Juju client now works properly on all Linuxes

This is FANTASTIC news for those using the Snap! On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:53 PM Rick Harding wrote: > Thanks Menno, this is great stuff. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 10:35 PM Menno Smits > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is just a quick

Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

Hey everyone, I know we're rocking towards 2.0 but this is a problem I've seen voiced a few times now. To date, the `name` field in charm has always been [a-z-0-9_-] where you can't end with `-#`. This makes sense, simple flat names that are all lowercase make it easy to do `juju deploy

Re: Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

lay names may also include unicode characters in the future, for example Übersoftware Which would need name to still be defined from a store/unique id perspective. As for case insensitive juju deploy command, I'd consider that out of scope of this proposal. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Mar

Proposal: DNS for Juju Charms

layer. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

Obsoleted, their aliases eventually removed On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 4:03 AM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an en

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

The repo has been updated: https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the > charm including a repo change. Future mp will be again

List plugins installed?

to list plugins in 2.0? [0]: https://github.com/juju/plugins/pull/69 Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: List plugins installed?

Thanks have some ideas about this, I'll file a bug (blueprint?) about it. I really care about plugins and would like to make them more robust in Juju. Marco On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 6:07 PM Tim Penhey wrote: > If we do that, then we can make the plug-in also install a

Re: Complex store queries

It sounds like you really want to add landscape client to each ;) On Tue, Oct 25, 2016, 10:21 PM Casey Marshall wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts < > merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for "which charms use this layer" queries.

Re: Instance metadata for private cloud.

Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Forwarded message - From: Jonathan Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:52 PM Subject: Instance metadata for private cloud. To: <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Hi All, Trying to test out juju on my private OpenStack cloud. Ha

Re: Removing the single point of failure

Hey everyone, We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online. This is unfortunate, but we're in the process of getting the interfaces.juju.solutions site, folded into the charm store properly. This service has done it's job in providing the initial indexing but as we see

Re: Setting up private cloud controller

the default model configuration for all new models going forward with: juju model-defaults Here's more information on that: https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.0/models-config Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:03 PM Jonathan D. Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Nov

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

charm build uses tactics during compilation to process files and tasks. These tactics are pluggable, which allows you to create custom tactics in your layer for things like you've desctibed. We have an example of this in the Kubernetes charms, where a custom layer tactic is used to seed static

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

he dependencies of a tactic should be installed? > > 2016-11-25 1:19 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com>: > > charm build uses tactics during compilation to process files and tasks. > These tactics are pluggable, which allows you to create custom tactics in > your lay

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: Zuul Charm

Hey James, I think this is the best way about it for the time being, discussing what people are working on ahead of it being perfect gives everyone a chance to see what's going on and can help focus people on getting help from others interested! On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:48 AM James Beedy

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

t; > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016, 4:42 AM Merlijn Sebrechts < > merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow, that looks really cool! > > Any best-practices of how the dependencies of a tactic should be installed? > > 2016-11-25 1:19 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonica

Re: Best way to put images in a Charm's readme?

This is an interesting idea. In the past I've uploaded images and gifs to things like imgur for hosting. Github does a lot of extra mark-down processing (even beyond GFM) like munging image paths. I thinks it's entirely possible that our charm store also do some smart post processing to produce

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

the cloud bringing up the instance. I plan on doing this across all the clouds I have access to, and track in a spreadsheet. I'll share that sheet out in a bit. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka <free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >

Re: Bundle SVG Generator updated

://svg.juju.solutions/?bundle=cs:~bigdata-dev/bundle/apache-analytics-sql-15=png Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:48 AM James Donner <james.don...@canonical.com> wrote: > This is a godsend. > > It used to be incredibly difficult to gather images of Juju bundles, but > this to

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM Casey Marshall <casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: [charms] Barbican + Identity Standalone - AWS

Hey James! We were looking at adding Keystone as a user management backend for Kubernetes. This is a great step forward in making that possible, I noticed the barbican charm in the AWS deploy was "local", are there any major changes to the charm from ~openstack-charmers needed for it to run in

Re: Discussing the Ubuntu charm

I'd prefer to continue to the discussion on the mailing thread. Happy to have an office hours on it though. Replying to your points on the thread from last week. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:42 AM José Antonio Rey wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'd like to call for a charmers

Re: Feedback from a new charm author

Hey Dean! Thanks for the email. I've got some replies in line. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM Dean Maniatis wrote: Hello, I'm a new charm author trying to learn the basics and decided to start with a simple bash template. I'm working on porting netdata

Bundle SVG Generator updated

msvg * https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/charm-svg The site is, of course, deployed and managed by Juju. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: > > On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer > to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of

Re: Charm release fails with "cannot update base entity for..."

Is this charm or bundle somewhere we can look at? On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:06 AM Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have the same issue in the staging charm store. > > > charm release cs:~tengu-team/jupyter-notebook-spark-0 > ERROR cannot release charm or bundle: cannot

Re: Layers and duplicated config options

Are these configuration options to be different values? If not charm-build will do the de-duping. I'm dubious of adding things like nagios configuration options to things like the kubernetes charm. This opens potentially having config options for zabbix or any other monitoring solution and

Re: Getting access to config in actions

Hook config is only setable by operators, not charms. If the-crawldb-uri isn't a config option specified in config.yaml and a value set by running `juju set` then the behavior you described is expected. I'd recommend using the kv module in charm-helpers to persist data between hooks.

Re: errors in my juju deploy of canonical distribution of kubernetes

Conjure-up does some things things in setting up pre-requisites for LXD so that Kubernetes/Docker work as expected. In the next release we'll be detecting these features and instead of having the applications error out, be providing a more concise message as to why it's failed and how to rectify.

Re: Juju Digest, Vol 71, Issue 18

The goal is to also add a synchronous interface which does async behind the scene. That will be in a future release. However, it looks like you're off to a good start! Marco On Fri, Dec 23, 2016, 6:51 PM James Beedy wrote: > I think I'm starting to see the light. I was

Re: config-changed from transient unit agent errors

I believe the other two scenarios where config-changed may run are agent returning from down state as well as after a machine reboot. These shouldn't be problematic so long as all hooks are idempotent. Marco On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:36 AM Jason Hobbs wrote: > I'm

Re: A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta2, and conjure-up, are here!

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:42 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta2, and conjure-up, are here! > > > ## What's new in 2.2-beta2 > > - [conjure-up] A new spell which deploys Landscape On-Premises 17.03 > - [conjure-up] Support for channels > > > ###

Re: Check out the openvpn charm form the tengu team

I'd like to point you both to this idea, which is one that was born from the same problem Kubernetes has: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1670838. The idea is actions should be able to both send and receive files. As actions are exposed in the GUI this could help address the above problem as

Re: Do states have namespace?

No, because it's a sqlitedb per unit of charm. So a charm collocated on the same machine will still have its own state. Can I ask what you're looking to achieve? Marco On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 10:05 fengxia wrote: > Replying my own question: > > charmhelpers.core.unitdata shows

Re: Do states have namespace?

Relations are for. They provide the ability to transfer key/vals between one or more connected item: https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/developer-layers-interfaces Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

<    1   2   3   >