Re: multi model/cloud deploy (how to deploy kubernates-workers in multitenant openstack)

I'd got one step further and say cross model relations are exactly what you're looking to do. I'd avoid using manual machine additions because it's really not a first class experience. In 2.2 cross model relations have matured quite a bit, there are still some limitations, but it might be worth

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

>>> >> > >>> https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/997 >> > >>> https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/999 >> > >>> >> > >>> It would be great to hear some feedback on this topic so that we >> are not >>

Re: set_state not setting the state immediately

So, I've not actually checked the logs in a while, but if visibility is an issue, it seems reasonable that the reactive framework should print in the log that X flags are being reset due to hook failure. Things like set_flag_immediate has farther reaching consequences than simply stating that

Re: vsphere support

There really shouldn't be any difference in the charms that are deploy-able on MAAS vs vSphere. The Juju team has made a lot of strides in 2.2 and the upcoming 2.3 release to support vSphere directly. MAAS management of vSphere is slightly different than Juju if I recall correctly, but shouldn't

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test on something other than edge. sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! > >

Re: charm mysql-57

Thanks for the heads up. I've opened these as bugs and will resolve them shortly. On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:56 AM Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > I don’t know whether is this is the right place to ask this question. > > The

Re: open-port: command not found

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 03:59 Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:20 AM Akshat Jiwan Sharma > wrote: > >> HI, >> >> I'm trying to manually expose a port on a juju machine. According to this >> answer >>

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:57 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new development release of Juju is here, 2.3-beta2. > Woop woop! > * Autoconfiguration of FAN networking for EC2 and GCE providers > > When creating a model in a VPC environment on EC2 or on GCE FAN settings >

Re: Juju 2.3.0 is here!

 Fan  Networking  is a  game  changer I've got something else for the .1 release - m5 instance types dropped last week in AWS, preparing a pull request now On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:30 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Hey, how did you know I was working on a plugin for

Re: open-port: command not found

to collect information from hook tools of all units in a deploy, network-get for example, or other commands. Marco On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:12 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

I've been using cross model relations in 2.3-beta for the past few weeks with little problem. I have a few more days of testing but I'll report back here next week if no one else has feedback. Marco On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:11 PM Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > This is a

Re: Juju, OpenStack and Packet.net @KubeCon Copenhagen

Hi Andrej, I'll send you an email off list, glad you enjoyed the demo! Marco On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:25 AM Andrej Golis wrote: > Hi community, > > I had a chance to see Juju in action deploying OpenStack on > Packet.net's ARM9 96-core system, which looked pretty cool

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

emote lxd cloud. I showed this in > last week's Juju show. > > https://youtu.be/CidoBy3iqUw > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 6:58 PM Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: Please promulgate Mattermost charm

Do you also have a riot charm? If not I'd be interested in helping author one. On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 19:31 Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Hi all > > > I created a Charm for Mattermost based on Casey's initial proof of > concept. I've been using it for more than a year now to host a Mattermost >

Re: Please promulgate Mattermost charm

g more traction, and seeing as they are getting > financial independence, I'd really like to see if we can integrate > Mattermost into Matrix more. > > > > On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, 16:26 Marco Ceppi, wrote: > >> Do you also have a riot charm? If not I'd be interested in helping au

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: > > > > > *A new development release of Juju is here, 2.4-rc1.## New and Improved - > LXD functionality has been updated to support version 3 of LXD. Better > support exists for LXD installed as a Snap, defaulting to Snap-installed > LXD by default if

Specify an existing security group as model config?

group can be set so instances have it in addition to the model/instance security group? Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Specify an existing security group as model config?

map to a m:n on security group basis to service model, based on the >> model's responsibilities and consumers. >> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/22/2017 03:03 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: >>> &

Re: Aggregate all bundle.yaml | API endpoint

Data flow in juju is bi-directional the order does not image or change anything in the relation On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 10:49 Ilias Tsoumas wrote: > Ok, it is clear. > Also, how I identify the "direction" of relationship? It is denoted with > order of the dashes? > *- - :* > * - :* > imply that

Re: High Availability command line interface - future plans.

you all do. I look forward to a solution, whatever it may be, in the future! Marco Ceppi On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote: On 07/11/13 15:00, Andrew Wilkins wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ian Booth ian.bo...@canonical.com mailto:ian.bo

Re: MySQL charm: hook failed: config-changed

sure it deploys consistently and everytime on all cloud providers. I'm in the process of writing tests for the MySQL charm so we'll have better exposure of this issue sooner. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Daniele Stroppa daniele.stro...@joyent.comwrote: David, I missed

Re: Proposal: making apt-get upgrade optional

I actually don't see a problem with removing apt-get upgrade, but what apt-get update? It's only 20s user time according to the original post. For stale cloud images, local provider and manual, it's just a no brained. Marco On Jul 1, 2014 4:04 PM, David Britton david.brit...@canonical.com wrote:

Re: First customer pain point pull request - default-hook

This might be a true problem when you don't map what event should fire what code in the hook. The majority, if not all, of charms that currently implement this pattern do so by either using charm-helpers or by having a giant if/else case statement at the bottom of the hook which maps which code

Re: Question about the start hook

juju mailing list to help correct and clarify these statements and shed some light once and for all. Finally, once it's been known, I'll be updating the author docs to detail the execution pattern in detail. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Humphrey, Timothy L (RIS-DAY

Re: Bleeding edge testers - do you want to try some new Juju Health/Status functionality?

Whew, because I was about to raise some serious concern over conflating namespaces :D On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Ian Booth ian.bo...@canonical.com wrote: Ah, yes, of course. Typo, sorry. On 02/04/15 20:19, John Meinel wrote: ... Hook tools -- juju-set, used to

Re: coloring juju logs a bit

ccze also works really well for colouring log output and is one less tool we have to build/maintain. Getting some fixes to it so it better colors juju logs would be a win I think. FWIW, I and others in eco have been using it for a while on a variety of application outputs including juju Marco On

Re: Making logging to MongoDB the default

How do current customers, like dtag, who are very keen on having everything goto syslog/rsyslog, going to keep that functionality going forward? Is there an easy mechanism to get the logs out of mongodb? All too often when I'm rummaging around in debug-hooks, I'll tail /var/log/juju/unit-*.log to

Re: Juju devel 1.26-alpha2 is available for testing

Hash: SHA256 > > On 2015-11-27 11:00 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > > - Running Wily (LXD is installed by default) > > > > > > For the LXD provider, I have the latest LXD installed on trusty, > > will that work or is it hard-coded to wily+ ? > > It will not work. Only platf

Re: Juju devel 1.26-alpha2 is available for testing

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:37 AM Aaron Bentley wrote: > # juju-core 1.26-alpha2 > This is probably the most anticipated release of the year. Looking forward to trying out all the new features! > ### LXD Provider > > The new LXD provider is the best way to use Juju

Re: Docker compose in Juju

Hi Gayan, I've added the general Juju list which covers more of these general topics. So, because of the nature of LXC machines and Docker style application containers it's hard to model that style application container in Juju in the same way LXC machines work. However, it's quite easy to wrap

Re: Automatic commit squashing

This is purely anecdotal, but on the ecosystem side for a lot of our projects I've tried to psuedo-enforce the "one commit", or really, a change/fix/feature per commit. Thereby allowing me to cherrypick for patch releases to stable (or revert a commit) with confidence and without a lot of hunting

Re: Juju 2.0-beta10 is here!

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:18 PM Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta10 is here! > > ## What's new? > > * Improved handling of LACP bonds > * Continued usability enhancements > * Users can now use `juju relate` to add a relation

filesystem type storage backend

block until storage is added? We really want to be able to support the /option/ or adding storage by the operator but we're not sure how this functions. If we use that directory before the operator attaches storage will it be mounted over or migrated? Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju

Re: filesystem type storage backend

This sounds very promising! Will play around with it a bit more. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 7:16 PM Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 05/02/16 17:47, Marco Ceppi wrote: > > Does this require the operator to add storage at deploy time? Does this > > mean our cha

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Very exciting to see these bits landing now! I'm looking forward to the alpha and trying out all the commands On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:05 AM Ian Booth wrote: > Yeah, there's a couple of places that need a bit of cleanup. With that > one, I > needed to double check

Re: Do we still need juju upgrade-charm --switch ... ?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:28 PM Ian Booth wrote: > So we have a feature of upgrade-charm which allows you to crossgrade to a > different charm than the one originally deployed. > > From the upgrade-charm help docs: > > The new charm's URL and revision are inferred as

Re: Reserved actions

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:49 PM Andrew Wilkins wrote: > Hi, > > There's a code review in progress (http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4286/) that > will introduce a predefined action, "juju-run", which is part of the > replacement for the current SSH-based juju-run. > This

Re: New juju in ubuntu

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:07 AM Stuart Bishop wrote: > On 5 April 2016 at 23:35, Martin Packman > wrote: > > > The challenge here is we want Juju 2.0 and all the new functionality > > to be the default on release, but not break our

Re: New juju in ubuntu

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:37 PM Martin Packman wrote: > On 05/04/2016, Adam Collard wrote: > > Will there be a transitional release of 1.25.x that also gives us a juju1 > > binary to facilitate this? > > Yes, the plan entails both an

Re: Charmers application - David Ames

Well, an outstanding turnout, thank you everyone for your feedback. With more than two +1 from existing charmers welcome thedac! Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM James Page <james.p...@canonical.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 15:37 Chris Glass

Re: Reserved actions

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:12 PM Andrew Wilkins < > andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:49 PM Andrew Wilkins < >>> andrew.wi

Re: LXD polish for xenial

Thanks for the update, appreciate the consideration! On Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 2:29 PM Alexis Bruemmer wrote: > Thank you all for the great feedback on 2.0! Based on this thread and > similar feedback the juju-core dev team has made some updates to the plan > for lxd

[ANN] charm & charm-tools 2.0!

t, j...@lists.ubuntu.com - report issues against either https://github.com/juju/charm-tools or https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client ask questions in #juju on freenode.net or on https://askubuntu.com Thanks, Marco Ceppi on behalf of the Juju Charm Community Team and UI Engineering Team -- Juju

Re: LXD polish for xenial

Thanks so much for spending time on this polish! It'll really help our user experience shine for cost effective dev. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 2:17 PM Martin Packman wrote: > When it comes to using lxd in clouds, as I understand it we've settled > on retaining the

Re: LXD polish for xenial

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 6:12 PM Tycho Andersen wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for looking into this. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:17:29PM +0100, Martin Packman wrote: > > With the LXD 2.0 release at the start of last week and the prospect of > > some stability, I

Re: LXD polish for xenial

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:31 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks so much for spending time on this polish! It'll really help our >> user experi

Re: Schema for Juju RPC messages

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:25 PM Rick Harding wrote: > That being said, any API client that requires three API calls to login >> should be beat over the head with a fail stick, but there are many cases >> where performing some workflow might require multiple api calls.

Re: Any mentor for adding a new provider available?

Hi Patrik, This would be a great and welcomed addition. I'm adding the juju-dev mailing list to this thread as that is where most the Juju Core development happens. Marco On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, 6:23 AM Patrik Karisch wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to add DigitalOcean as

Re: network spaces - aws support

What does `juju status --format yaml` produce? it should provide more fruitful machine errors. Marco On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:46 PM James Beedy wrote: > I'm having some issues with deploying instances to network spaces on aws. > > Problem: Instance errors on deploy > > I

Re: juju run-action --application?

Because of the ambiguous nature of actions and application. Some would expect, as you do, to run on all units. Others would expect the leader to coordinate that action. Furthermore, it becomes more complex as to how results are curated. Do you get back X UUIDs one for each unit or a single action

Re: hub github helper

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:16 AM John Meinel wrote: > On Aug 2, 2016 6:08 PM, "Nate Finch" wrote: > > > > > > > > To make a PR from the CLI using hub, make sure the repo you want to PR > against is the git remote called origin, then you can make a

Re: Juju 2.0-beta12 ETA

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:51 PM Cheryl Jennings < cheryl.jenni...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Due to the US holidays and with much of the team at core and networking > sprints, we will be releasing 2.0-beta12 next week. There are currently 6 > assigned critical bugs [0] that need to

Re: Juju 2.0-beta12 ETA

Thanks! On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:43 PM Cheryl Jennings < cheryl.jenni...@canonical.com> wrote: > There are no API changes planned for beta12, but if any do come up, they > will be announced on the mailing lists. > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@c

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta17, is here! > > ## What's new? > > * add-model now takes region name as an optional positional argument, >to be consistent with bootstrap. The --region flag has

kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

Hey everyone, I know we've had discussions about this over the past few months, but it seems we have three commands that overlap pretty aggressively. Using Juju beta16, and trying to 'destroy' a controller it looks like this now: ``` root@ubuntu:~# juju help destroy-controller Usage: juju

Re: JUJU Charm Certification

juju add-relation cinder san2 Now, you can configure each of the new applications, which are teh same copy of the charm deployed multiple times. This will add a unique backend per charm copy which seems to be your intended use case. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:03 PM

Re: kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

someone without thinking. > What happens if I destroy-controller without that flag? Do I have to go into my cloud portal to kill those instances? Is there any way to recover from that to get juju reconnected? If not, it's just a slower death. > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marco Ceppi <m

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in edge? Marco On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels > (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel

Re: Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

lay names may also include unicode characters in the future, for example Übersoftware Which would need name to still be defined from a store/unique id perspective. As for case insensitive juju deploy command, I'd consider that out of scope of this proposal. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Mar

Re: List plugins installed?

Thanks have some ideas about this, I'll file a bug (blueprint?) about it. I really care about plugins and would like to make them more robust in Juju. Marco On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 6:07 PM Tim Penhey wrote: > If we do that, then we can make the plug-in also install a

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: Zuul Charm

Hey James, I think this is the best way about it for the time being, discussing what people are working on ahead of it being perfect gives everyone a chance to see what's going on and can help focus people on getting help from others interested! On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:48 AM James Beedy

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

I think the actual path is to streamline reactive framework, so that Ubuntu is the simplest example of reactive. Anyone can, as Nate demonstrated, create a minimal charm. The feedback here is great so far and we're going to be iterating on the framework. Marco On Fri, Dec 9, 2016, 9:32 AM John

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

the cloud bringing up the instance. I plan on doing this across all the clouds I have access to, and track in a spreadsheet. I'll share that sheet out in a bit. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka <free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >

Re: Bundle SVG Generator updated

://svg.juju.solutions/?bundle=cs:~bigdata-dev/bundle/apache-analytics-sql-15=png Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:48 AM James Donner <james.don...@canonical.com> wrote: > This is a godsend. > > It used to be incredibly difficult to gather images of Juju bundles, but > this to

Re: [charms] Barbican + Identity Standalone - AWS

Hey James! We were looking at adding Keystone as a user management backend for Kubernetes. This is a great step forward in making that possible, I noticed the barbican charm in the AWS deploy was "local", are there any major changes to the charm from ~openstack-charmers needed for it to run in

Re: One instance manual provider

A one machine manual provider? Might as well just `ssh ; juju bootstrap lxd`. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:09 AM Nate Finch wrote: > The should be no reason you can't deploy to the controller machine using > manual just like any other cloud. > > juju bootstrap

Bundle SVG Generator updated

msvg * https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/charm-svg The site is, of course, deployed and managed by Juju. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: > > On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer > to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of

Re: Application names starting with digits

n it's a bit of a stretch weighing the pros and cons for the amount of work needed to support unicode throughout Juju as an application name. Marco > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM Nate Finch

Re: Application names starting with digits

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM Nate Finch wrote: > One thing we *could* do to support non-english names that would not > entirely open the door to emoji etc is to simply constrain the names to > unicode letters and numbers. Thus you could name something 數據庫 but > not

Re: Default Controller Type on GCE

The "problem" with Google, is you can actually customize the CPU/Memory arbitrarily per instance. So they have recommended instance types, but you can change those properties. I'm not sure why you're getting an n1-highcpu-4. Default bootstrap for me has been a n1-standard-1 Marco On Tue, Jan 10,

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test on something other than edge. sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! > >

Re: open-port: command not found

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 03:59 Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:20 AM Akshat Jiwan Sharma > wrote: > >> HI, >> >> I'm trying to manually expose a port on a juju machine. According to this >> answer >>

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:57 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new development release of Juju is here, 2.3-beta2. > Woop woop! > * Autoconfiguration of FAN networking for EC2 and GCE providers > > When creating a model in a VPC environment on EC2 or on GCE FAN settings >

Re: Juju 2.3.0 is here!

 Fan  Networking  is a  game  changer I've got something else for the .1 release - m5 instance types dropped last week in AWS, preparing a pull request now On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:30 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Hey, how did you know I was working on a plugin for

Re: open-port: command not found

to collect information from hook tools of all units in a deploy, network-get for example, or other commands. Marco On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:12 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

emote lxd cloud. I showed this in > last week's Juju show. > > https://youtu.be/CidoBy3iqUw > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 6:58 PM Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: 100 contributors to juju!

That page ends at #98 - but still great to see! Proud to have my 6 commits in there On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:45 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > We're in triple digits! I'm not sure when this happened, but it's > exciting nonetheless. > >

<    1   2   3