Re: Aggregate all bundle.yaml | API endpoint

Data flow in juju is bi-directional the order does not image or change anything in the relation On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 10:49 Ilias Tsoumas wrote: > Ok, it is clear. > Also, how I identify the "direction" of relationship? It is denoted with > order of the dashes? > *- - :* > * - :* > imply that

Re: Please promulgate Mattermost charm

g more traction, and seeing as they are getting > financial independence, I'd really like to see if we can integrate > Mattermost into Matrix more. > > > > On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, 16:26 Marco Ceppi, wrote: > >> Do you also have a riot charm? If not I'd be interested in helping au

Re: Please promulgate Mattermost charm

Do you also have a riot charm? If not I'd be interested in helping author one. On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 19:31 Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Hi all > > > I created a Charm for Mattermost based on Casey's initial proof of > concept. I've been using it for more than a year now to host a Mattermost >

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

emote lxd cloud. I showed this in > last week's Juju show. > > https://youtu.be/CidoBy3iqUw > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 6:58 PM Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

emote lxd cloud. I showed this in > last week's Juju show. > > https://youtu.be/CidoBy3iqUw > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 6:58 PM Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: Juju 2.4-rc1 Released

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 21:33 Kelvin Liu wrote: > > > > > *A new development release of Juju is here, 2.4-rc1.## New and Improved - > LXD functionality has been updated to support version 3 of LXD. Better > support exists for LXD installed as a Snap, defaulting to Snap-installed > LXD by default if

Re: Juju, OpenStack and Packet.net @KubeCon Copenhagen

Hi Andrej, I'll send you an email off list, glad you enjoyed the demo! Marco On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:25 AM Andrej Golis wrote: > Hi community, > > I had a chance to see Juju in action deploying OpenStack on > Packet.net's ARM9 96-core system, which looked pretty cool

Re: 100 contributors to juju!

That page ends at #98 - but still great to see! Proud to have my 6 commits in there On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:45 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > We're in triple digits! I'm not sure when this happened, but it's > exciting nonetheless. > >

Re: Specify an existing security group as model config?

map to a m:n on security group basis to service model, based on the >> model's responsibilities and consumers. >> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/22/2017 03:03 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: >>> &

Specify an existing security group as model config?

group can be set so instances have it in addition to the model/instance security group? Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Juju 2.3.0 is here!

 Fan  Networking  is a  game  changer I've got something else for the .1 release - m5 instance types dropped last week in AWS, preparing a pull request now On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:30 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Hey, how did you know I was working on a plugin for

Re: Juju 2.3.0 is here!

 Fan  Networking  is a  game  changer I've got something else for the .1 release - m5 instance types dropped last week in AWS, preparing a pull request now On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:30 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Hey, how did you know I was working on a plugin for

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:57 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new development release of Juju is here, 2.3-beta2. > Woop woop! > * Autoconfiguration of FAN networking for EC2 and GCE providers > > When creating a model in a VPC environment on EC2 or on GCE FAN settings >

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:57 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new development release of Juju is here, 2.3-beta2. > Woop woop! > * Autoconfiguration of FAN networking for EC2 and GCE providers > > When creating a model in a VPC environment on EC2 or on GCE FAN settings >

Re: open-port: command not found

to collect information from hook tools of all units in a deploy, network-get for example, or other commands. Marco On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:12 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >

Re: open-port: command not found

to collect information from hook tools of all units in a deploy, network-get for example, or other commands. Marco On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:12 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> >

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

I've been using cross model relations in 2.3-beta for the past few weeks with little problem. I have a few more days of testing but I'll report back here next week if no one else has feedback. Marco On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:11 PM Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > This is a

Re: open-port: command not found

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 03:59 Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:20 AM Akshat Jiwan Sharma > wrote: > >> HI, >> >> I'm trying to manually expose a port on a juju machine. According to this >> answer >>

Re: open-port: command not found

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 03:59 Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:20 AM Akshat Jiwan Sharma > wrote: > >> HI, >> >> I'm trying to manually expose a port on a juju machine. According to this >> answer >>

Re: vsphere support

There really shouldn't be any difference in the charms that are deploy-able on MAAS vs vSphere. The Juju team has made a lot of strides in 2.2 and the upcoming 2.3 release to support vSphere directly. MAAS management of vSphere is slightly different than Juju if I recall correctly, but shouldn't

Re: set_state not setting the state immediately

So, I've not actually checked the logs in a while, but if visibility is an issue, it seems reasonable that the reactive framework should print in the log that X flags are being reset due to hook failure. Things like set_flag_immediate has farther reaching consequences than simply stating that

Re: charm mysql-57

Thanks for the heads up. I've opened these as bugs and will resolve them shortly. On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:56 AM Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > I don’t know whether is this is the right place to ask this question. > > The

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

>>> >> > >>> https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/997 >> > >>> https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/999 >> > >>> >> > >>> It would be great to hear some feedback on this topic so that we >> are not >>

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test on something other than edge. sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! > >

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test on something other than edge. sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! > >

Re: multi model/cloud deploy (how to deploy kubernates-workers in multitenant openstack)

I'd got one step further and say cross model relations are exactly what you're looking to do. I'd avoid using manual machine additions because it's really not a first class experience. In 2.2 cross model relations have matured quite a bit, there are still some limitations, but it might be worth

Re: Do states have namespace?

No, because it's a sqlitedb per unit of charm. So a charm collocated on the same machine will still have its own state. Can I ask what you're looking to achieve? Marco On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 10:05 fengxia wrote: > Replying my own question: > > charmhelpers.core.unitdata shows

Re: Do states have namespace?

Relations are for. They provide the ability to transfer key/vals between one or more connected item: https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/developer-layers-interfaces Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Check out the openvpn charm form the tengu team

I'd like to point you both to this idea, which is one that was born from the same problem Kubernetes has: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1670838. The idea is actions should be able to both send and receive files. As actions are exposed in the GUI this could help address the above problem as

Re: config-changed from transient unit agent errors

I believe the other two scenarios where config-changed may run are agent returning from down state as well as after a machine reboot. These shouldn't be problematic so long as all hooks are idempotent. Marco On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:36 AM Jason Hobbs wrote: > I'm

Re: A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta2, and conjure-up, are here!

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:42 AM Chris Lee wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta2, and conjure-up, are here! > > > ## What's new in 2.2-beta2 > > - [conjure-up] A new spell which deploys Landscape On-Premises 17.03 > - [conjure-up] Support for channels > > > ###

Re: All our Charms became hidden because we promulgated some

You're not the only one and it's something that's in the works! On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, 08:02 Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > God, I would love to have a "how many charms use this layer" search > function! > > 2017-02-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber : > >

Re: Request to join ~charmers

I am a +1, I've reviewed a lot of Pete's work and he understands the core principals of charming and will make a fine addition. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:01 AM Pete Vander Giessen < pete.vandergies...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been working with the Big Data team since May 2016,

Re: normal charm to subordinate charm and now peer relation does not work

This is one of the areas we're going to improve with Reactive 2.0, where the relation scope will be obsoleted as it's confusing and doesn't add much value to the overall framework. Updates and plans regarding that will be available soon! Marco On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:40 AM Alex Kavanagh

Re: Default Controller Type on GCE

The "problem" with Google, is you can actually customize the CPU/Memory arbitrarily per instance. So they have recommended instance types, but you can change those properties. I'm not sure why you're getting an n1-highcpu-4. Default bootstrap for me has been a n1-standard-1 Marco On Tue, Jan 10,

Re: Layers and duplicated config options

Are these configuration options to be different values? If not charm-build will do the de-duping. I'm dubious of adding things like nagios configuration options to things like the kubernetes charm. This opens potentially having config options for zabbix or any other monitoring solution and

Re: Charm release fails with "cannot update base entity for..."

Is this charm or bundle somewhere we can look at? On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:06 AM Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have the same issue in the staging charm store. > > > charm release cs:~tengu-team/jupyter-notebook-spark-0 > ERROR cannot release charm or bundle: cannot

Re: errors in my juju deploy of canonical distribution of kubernetes

Conjure-up does some things things in setting up pre-requisites for LXD so that Kubernetes/Docker work as expected. In the next release we'll be detecting these features and instead of having the applications error out, be providing a more concise message as to why it's failed and how to rectify.

Re: Getting access to config in actions

Hook config is only setable by operators, not charms. If the-crawldb-uri isn't a config option specified in config.yaml and a value set by running `juju set` then the behavior you described is expected. I'd recommend using the kv module in charm-helpers to persist data between hooks.

Re: Juju Digest, Vol 71, Issue 18

The goal is to also add a synchronous interface which does async behind the scene. That will be in a future release. However, it looks like you're off to a good start! Marco On Fri, Dec 23, 2016, 6:51 PM James Beedy wrote: > I think I'm starting to see the light. I was

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

the cloud bringing up the instance. I plan on doing this across all the clouds I have access to, and track in a spreadsheet. I'll share that sheet out in a bit. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

the cloud bringing up the instance. I plan on doing this across all the clouds I have access to, and track in a spreadsheet. I'll share that sheet out in a bit. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

I think the actual path is to streamline reactive framework, so that Ubuntu is the simplest example of reactive. Anyone can, as Nate demonstrated, create a minimal charm. The feedback here is great so far and we're going to be iterating on the framework. Marco On Fri, Dec 9, 2016, 9:32 AM John

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

t; > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016, 4:42 AM Merlijn Sebrechts < > merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow, that looks really cool! > > Any best-practices of how the dependencies of a tactic should be installed? > > 2016-11-25 1:19 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonica

Re: Best way to put images in a Charm's readme?

This is an interesting idea. In the past I've uploaded images and gifs to things like imgur for hosting. Github does a lot of extra mark-down processing (even beyond GFM) like munging image paths. I thinks it's entirely possible that our charm store also do some smart post processing to produce

Re: One instance manual provider

A one machine manual provider? Might as well just `ssh ; juju bootstrap lxd`. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:09 AM Nate Finch wrote: > The should be no reason you can't deploy to the controller machine using > manual just like any other cloud. > > juju bootstrap

Re: Feedback from a new charm author

Hey Dean! Thanks for the email. I've got some replies in line. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM Dean Maniatis wrote: Hello, I'm a new charm author trying to learn the basics and decided to start with a simple bash template. I'm working on porting netdata

Re: Discussing the Ubuntu charm

I'd prefer to continue to the discussion on the mailing thread. Happy to have an office hours on it though. Replying to your points on the thread from last week. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:42 AM José Antonio Rey wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'd like to call for a charmers

Re: Application names starting with digits

n it's a bit of a stretch weighing the pros and cons for the amount of work needed to support unicode throughout Juju as an application name. Marco > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM Nate Finch

Re: Application names starting with digits

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM Nate Finch wrote: > One thing we *could* do to support non-english names that would not > entirely open the door to emoji etc is to simply constrain the names to > unicode letters and numbers. Thus you could name something 數據庫 but > not

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM Casey Marshall <casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 N

Re: Bundle SVG Generator updated

://svg.juju.solutions/?bundle=cs:~bigdata-dev/bundle/apache-analytics-sql-15=png Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:48 AM James Donner <james.don...@canonical.com> wrote: > This is a godsend. > > It used to be incredibly difficult to gather images of Juju bundles, but > this to

Re: Bundle SVG Generator updated

://svg.juju.solutions/?bundle=cs:~bigdata-dev/bundle/apache-analytics-sql-15=png Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:48 AM James Donner <james.don...@canonical.com> wrote: > This is a godsend. > > It used to be incredibly difficult to gather images of Juju bundles, but > this to

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka <free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka <free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: > > On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer > to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: > > On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer > to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of

Bundle SVG Generator updated

msvg * https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/charm-svg The site is, of course, deployed and managed by Juju. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Bundle SVG Generator updated

msvg * https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/charm-svg The site is, of course, deployed and managed by Juju. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: [charms] Barbican + Identity Standalone - AWS

Hey James! We were looking at adding Keystone as a user management backend for Kubernetes. This is a great step forward in making that possible, I noticed the barbican charm in the AWS deploy was "local", are there any major changes to the charm from ~openstack-charmers needed for it to run in

Re: [charms] Barbican + Identity Standalone - AWS

Hey James! We were looking at adding Keystone as a user management backend for Kubernetes. This is a great step forward in making that possible, I noticed the barbican charm in the AWS deploy was "local", are there any major changes to the charm from ~openstack-charmers needed for it to run in

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

he dependencies of a tactic should be installed? > > 2016-11-25 1:19 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com>: > > charm build uses tactics during compilation to process files and tasks. > These tactics are pluggable, which allows you to create custom tactics in > your lay

Re: Hooking into `charm build` to download Puppet dependencies

charm build uses tactics during compilation to process files and tasks. These tactics are pluggable, which allows you to create custom tactics in your layer for things like you've desctibed. We have an example of this in the Kubernetes charms, where a custom layer tactic is used to seed static

Re: Setting up private cloud controller

the default model configuration for all new models going forward with: juju model-defaults Here's more information on that: https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.0/models-config Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:03 PM Jonathan D. Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Nov

Re: Removing the single point of failure

Hey everyone, We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online. This is unfortunate, but we're in the process of getting the interfaces.juju.solutions site, folded into the charm store properly. This service has done it's job in providing the initial indexing but as we see

Re: Instance metadata for private cloud.

Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Forwarded message - From: Jonathan Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:52 PM Subject: Instance metadata for private cloud. To: <juju@lists.ubuntu.com> Hi All, Trying to test out juju on my private OpenStack cloud. Ha

Re: Zuul Charm

Hey James, I think this is the best way about it for the time being, discussing what people are working on ahead of it being perfect gives everyone a chance to see what's going on and can help focus people on getting help from others interested! On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:48 AM James Beedy

Re: Zuul Charm

Hey James, I think this is the best way about it for the time being, discussing what people are working on ahead of it being perfect gives everyone a chance to see what's going on and can help focus people on getting help from others interested! On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:48 AM James Beedy

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: Complex store queries

It sounds like you really want to add landscape client to each ;) On Tue, Oct 25, 2016, 10:21 PM Casey Marshall wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts < > merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for "which charms use this layer" queries.

Re: List plugins installed?

Thanks have some ideas about this, I'll file a bug (blueprint?) about it. I really care about plugins and would like to make them more robust in Juju. Marco On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 6:07 PM Tim Penhey wrote: > If we do that, then we can make the plug-in also install a

Re: List plugins installed?

Thanks have some ideas about this, I'll file a bug (blueprint?) about it. I really care about plugins and would like to make them more robust in Juju. Marco On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 6:07 PM Tim Penhey wrote: > If we do that, then we can make the plug-in also install a

List plugins installed?

to list plugins in 2.0? [0]: https://github.com/juju/plugins/pull/69 Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Proposal: DNS for Juju Charms

layer. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

lay names may also include unicode characters in the future, for example Übersoftware Which would need name to still be defined from a store/unique id perspective. As for case insensitive juju deploy command, I'd consider that out of scope of this proposal. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Mar

Re: Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

lay names may also include unicode characters in the future, for example Übersoftware Which would need name to still be defined from a store/unique id perspective. As for case insensitive juju deploy command, I'd consider that out of scope of this proposal. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Mar

Proposal: display-name for charm metadata

Hey everyone, I know we're rocking towards 2.0 but this is a problem I've seen voiced a few times now. To date, the `name` field in charm has always been [a-z-0-9_-] where you can't end with `-#`. This makes sense, simple flat names that are all lowercase make it easy to do `juju deploy

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

Obsoleted, their aliases eventually removed On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 4:03 AM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an en

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

The repo has been updated: https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the > charm including a repo change. Future mp will be again

Re: Juju client now works properly on all Linuxes

This is FANTASTIC news for those using the Snap! On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:53 PM Rick Harding wrote: > Thanks Menno, this is great stuff. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 10:35 PM Menno Smits > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is just a quick

Re: Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

Hi Ryan, I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try again? Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: > Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes? I'd like to > validate

Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to test the latest version with `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate` If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week I'll move what's in candidate to stable. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

charm-helpers 0.9.1

built charm, you will need to run charm build again. There was a problem in the setup.py for the project which excluded a few packages. The project's been updated from distutils to setuptools and future proofed against this problem. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com

Deploying Xenial charms in LXD? Read this

I believe these are the two related ones for this problem: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1621229 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1576692 I'll make sure to post an update when this has been resolved. Thanks, Marco Ceppi -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.

Re: JUJU Charm Certification

juju add-relation cinder san2 Now, you can configure each of the new applications, which are teh same copy of the charm deployed multiple times. This will add a unique backend per charm copy which seems to be your intended use case. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:03 PM

Re: JUJU Charm Certification

juju add-relation cinder san2 Now, you can configure each of the new applications, which are teh same copy of the charm deployed multiple times. This will add a unique backend per charm copy which seems to be your intended use case. Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:03 PM

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

Oh my god, how did I miss this! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016, 7:22 PM Andrew Wilkins <andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:26 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < >>

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta17, is here! > > ## What's new? > > * add-model now takes region name as an optional positional argument, >to be consistent with bootstrap. The --region flag has

Re: Juju 2.0-beta17 is here!

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new development release of Juju, 2.0-beta17, is here! > > ## What's new? > > * add-model now takes region name as an optional positional argument, >to be consistent with bootstrap. The --region flag has

Re: kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

someone without thinking. > What happens if I destroy-controller without that flag? Do I have to go into my cloud portal to kill those instances? Is there any way to recover from that to get juju reconnected? If not, it's just a slower death. > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marco Ceppi <m

Re: kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

someone without thinking. > What happens if I destroy-controller without that flag? Do I have to go into my cloud portal to kill those instances? Is there any way to recover from that to get juju reconnected? If not, it's just a slower death. > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marco Ceppi <m

kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

Hey everyone, I know we've had discussions about this over the past few months, but it seems we have three commands that overlap pretty aggressively. Using Juju beta16, and trying to 'destroy' a controller it looks like this now: ``` root@ubuntu:~# juju help destroy-controller Usage: juju

kill-controller, unregister, destroy-controller

Hey everyone, I know we've had discussions about this over the past few months, but it seems we have three commands that overlap pretty aggressively. Using Juju beta16, and trying to 'destroy' a controller it looks like this now: ``` root@ubuntu:~# juju help destroy-controller Usage: juju

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in edge? Marco On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels > (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in edge? Marco On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels > (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel

charm and charm-tools are now snap'd for testing

Hi everyone, In preparation for the next release of charm-tools and charmstore-client we've snap'd up the two making it easier to subscribe to the latest nightly, beta, candidate, and stable releases of the tools. The snap isn't 100% ready yet, but it's confined and operational. I'd like to tap

Re: hub github helper

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:16 AM John Meinel wrote: > On Aug 2, 2016 6:08 PM, "Nate Finch" wrote: > > > > > > > > To make a PR from the CLI using hub, make sure the repo you want to PR > against is the git remote called origin, then you can make a

Re: juju run-action --application?

Because of the ambiguous nature of actions and application. Some would expect, as you do, to run on all units. Others would expect the leader to coordinate that action. Furthermore, it becomes more complex as to how results are curated. Do you get back X UUIDs one for each unit or a single action

Re: Juju as a snap

Hopefully the snapcraft.yaml shows up in the repo. We're gearing up to do the same with charm-tools very soon, excited to provide a daily build in edge and proper candidates in candidate channel. I'll mail the list when we make the switch. Marco On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, 5:12 PM Tom Barber

  1   2   3   >