On 22 January 2015 at 16:36, Simon Davy <bloodearn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 January 2015 at 16:29, David Britton <david.brit...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:17:26PM +0000, Simon Davy wrote: > >> On 22 January 2015 at 15:13, David Britton <david.brit...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > lint: > >> > - make lint > >> > > >> > >> Could we also make[1] the charm linter lint the makefile for the > >> presence of targets agreed in the outcome of this thread? > > > > "charm proof" > > > > I like it. (bundle tester already runs this) > > Which is interesting, as my lint targets general runs charm proof too, > so it'd be run twice in that case? > > Not a big issue, but if the charm store/review queue is automatically > charm-proofing too, perhaps the make lint target should not be? > > -- > Simon > > Whelp it's still nice to have as part of lint when developing the charm, and charm-proof isn't exactly the slowest process to run multiple times.
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
