On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Johnny Shieh jsh...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Remove of reference to non-existent PPA actually results in a successful
install on Power.
Should the reference to PPA be removed?
Hi Johnny,
Randall Ross is investigating the status of PPA builders for POWER but
it'll
randall.r...@canonical.com
Date: 04/17/2015 06:19 AM
Subject:Re: Existing Charms: Can we get ppc64 PPA's built?
Sent by:jorge.cas...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Johnny Shieh jsh...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Remove of reference to non-existent PPA actually results
We need to have in kind that these are packaged by individuals or teams who
may do it in their spare time, hence the lack of ppc64. If we remove them,
what would be the consequences? Are the packages in the archives the same
version as the PPA, or does the PPA provide us with a newer version? If
Hi all,
The following bugs, identified internally by Canonical, reference a
situation where the charm relies on a PPA.
There is an existing PPA for the x86 architecture, but not one for ppc64el.
Can someone look and see if they can
generate the appropriate ppc64el PPA for the following
