On 02/10/15 09:29, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> charm proof provides three levels of output:
>
> E: Error, this charm will not deploy in it's current state
> W: Warning, this charm violates the "recommended" charm store policy
> I: Information, things to consider, but no inherently wrong
>
> Based on the
Thank you guys, and thank you so much for all the awesome work on juju---it
rocks! :)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Marco Ceppi
wrote:
> I agree completely and now understand the confusion in the output Fred.
> However the ERROR line is coming from Juju and not
Hello Fred!
charm proof provides three levels of output:
E: Error, this charm will not deploy in it's current state
W: Warning, this charm violates the "recommended" charm store policy
I: Information, things to consider, but no inherently wrong
Based on the output, you seem to be missing a
Hello Fred!
charm proof provides three levels of output:
E: Error, this charm will not deploy in it's current state
W: Warning, this charm violates the "recommended" charm store policy
I: Information, things to consider, but no inherently wrong
Based on the output, you seem to be missing a
Thank you, Marco!
I was more concerned about the subprocess error at the end; so I guess this
is fine too? I will try completing my first charm and deploy it locally to
see what happens :)
Best,
Fred
On Friday, October 2, 2015, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> Hello Fred!
>
> charm proof