Hi all,
(cross-posting to juju juju-dev)
I've created a tool / library for organizing and managing resources
(binary blobs, tarballs, Python packages, and, eventually, apt
packages) required by a charm. The idea is to be an interim tool, and
a test-bed for the resource features that have been
I can, but that's not the right way to proceed if you were in fact
trying to implement an important feature of juju that was extensively
discussed.
1. The project has a technical lead and a manager which should have
the proper information to bootstrap this, or at least know who to talk
to.
2.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Eric Snow eric.s...@canonical.com wrote:
tl;dr Using fakes for testing works well so I wrote a base fake type. [1]
While working on the GCE provider, Wayne and I started taking a
different approach to unit testing than the usual 1. expose an
external
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Looks okay in principal, though I'm not sure how much benefit it would
add to the existing, tailored fakes in the codebase. It seems a little bit
weird that error results are encapsulated, but not non-error
Hey all,
I've been working on fixing the problem(s) with deploying juju behind a
proxy [1]. This involved creating kvm instances (using virt-manager),
firewalling them off to only have access to the network through a proxy
(squid running on the host) and bootstrapping with the manual
Hi Dave
Blocks protect environment from accidental corruption by blocking some
operations.
Here is the spec
https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1XFYlNGmQH7-X68IXhdxsANwHN6DgAL_RMn7IDK7ZbJc/edit#heading=h.ap4vrey3xxh6
Let me know if I could be of further assistance :D
Sincerely
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:51 PM, William Reade william.re...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Not sure I follow what you're saying about in terms of the storage
types,
so
I'll describe how it is at the moment.
