Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

2016-08-31 Thread Francesco Banconi
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 18:39, SivaRamaPrasad Ravipati wrote: > > Is this issue solved in JUJU version 2.0-beta16-xenial-amd64? Yes it is: previous beta versions assumed only development and stable as valid channels. Starting from beta16 this is no longer the case. -- Francesco -- Juju-de

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

2016-08-31 Thread Brad Crittenden
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 09:14 , Marco Ceppi wrote: > > What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in > edge? > > Marco Yes, they were migrated to edge. —bac > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore prov

Re: New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

2016-08-31 Thread Marco Ceppi
What happened to the charms that were in development channel? Are they now in edge? Marco On Wed, Aug 31, 2016, 9:06 AM Brad Crittenden wrote: > The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels > (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel is now dropped. > > Th

New jujucharms.com released -- upgrade to Juju 2.0-beta16 required

2016-08-31 Thread Brad Crittenden
The new version of the charmstore provides support for four channels (edge, beta, candidate, stable). The development channel is now dropped. The versions of Juju 2.0 prior to beta 16 only recognized the development and stable channels. So if you are using Juju 2.0 it is necessary that you upgr