Re: killing old dead controllers

2017-06-12 Thread John Meinel
If the machines are just gone (you manually destroyed them via 'lxc stop/delete'). You can just do: juju unregister lxd-test It will remove it from the local registry without trying to tear anything down. John =:-> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Bidwell wrote:

killing old dead controllers

2017-06-12 Thread Daniel Bidwell
I have a machine with 2 dead controllers that I can't figure out how to delete.  A "juju controllers" produces the following: root@juju:~# juju controllers Use --refresh flag with this command to see the latest information. Controller  ModelUser   Access Cloud/Region Models  

Re: Juju 2.2-rc2 has been released

2017-06-12 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Yes, and this too has been corrected. You should expect releases to flow down to level of risk. So, when 2.2 releases, beta, candidate and stable will all point to the 2.2 revision (until the first beta for 2.3, and so on). channels: latest/stable:2.1.3 (1922) 24MB

Re: Juju 2.2-rc2 has been released

2017-06-12 Thread Jason Hobbs
Nicholas, Thanks. beta is still 2.2rc1. Should it be 2.2rc2 also? Jason On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up Jason. Yes, small snafu with publishing the > builds. Edge builds are tracking develop (2.3-alpha1) and

Re: Juju 2.2-rc2 has been released

2017-06-12 Thread Jason Hobbs
I noticed that for the juju snap, edge and beta channels have older releases than candidate. Shouldn't they always be at least the same version as candidate, if not newer? stable:2.1.3 (1922) 24MB classic candidate: 2.2-rc2 (1929) 25MB classic beta:

Re: Juju-dev Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10

2017-06-12 Thread James Beedy
n techniques. > > - Menno > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/ > 20170612/59c96e86/attachment-0001.html> > > --