Re: Organising apiserver facades

+1 This helps us get to towards the requested feature of having client and agent facades served from different network spaces. Having controller agent facades only served on localhost would also be nice from a security perspective. On 7 Jul 2017 11:17 am, "Andrew Wilkins"

Re: Organising apiserver facades

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:09 PM John Meinel wrote: > I'd really like to see us split apart the facades-by-purpose. So we'd > collect the facades for Agents separately from facades for Users (and > possibly also facades for Controller). > I'm not sure if moving things just

Re: Organising apiserver facades

I agree with John. Having the agent facades separate from the client facades would also be good. Tim On 06/07/17 23:09, John Meinel wrote: > I'd really like to see us split apart the facades-by-purpose. So we'd > collect the facades for Agents separately from facades for Users (and > possibly

Re: Organising apiserver facades

I'd really like to see us split apart the facades-by-purpose. So we'd collect the facades for Agents separately from facades for Users (and possibly also facades for Controller). I'm not sure if moving things just into 'facades' just moves the problem around and leaves us with just a *different*

Organising apiserver facades

The juju/apiserver package currently has a whole lot of facade packages within it, as well as some other packages related to authentication, logging, and other bits and bobs. I find it difficult to navigate and tell what's what a lot of the time. I'd like to move the apiserver facade packages

Re: lost reviews

I did a bit more investigation after sending that email and it seems that the data really has gone forever. On 5 July 2017 at 23:23, Menno Smits wrote: > I *believe* a database dump of the reviewboard site was kept but the site > was taken down as it wasn't being used.