Keep in mind that the charm-build update is really more housekeeping to
allow us to retire the old interfaces.juju.solutions domain entirely. All
charm builds should now be using the new repo. But of course testing of
that change is more than welcome.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Marco Ceppi
This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test
on something other than edge.
sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh <
tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Fantastic, this is a great change - well done!
>
>
Fantastic, this is a great change - well done!
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Today we migrated the index of base and interface layers used to build
> charms over to the GitHub repository https://github.com/juju/layer-index.
>
+1 awesome work folks.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:49 PM Tim Van Steenburgh <
tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Barber wrote:
>
>> good effort devs!
>>
>
> +1, thanks Cory.
>
>
>>
>> On 8 Sep 2017 7:42 pm, "Cory Johns"
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Barber wrote:
> good effort devs!
>
+1, thanks Cory.
>
> On 8 Sep 2017 7:42 pm, "Cory Johns" wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I just wanted to make a quick announcement that the charm snap is now
>> strictly
Greetings,
I just wanted to make a quick announcement that the charm snap is now
strictly confined on the stable channel (rev 17). This fixes issues like
https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/339 and
https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/319 and prevents similar issues
from cropping up
Greetings,
Today we migrated the index of base and interface layers used to build
charms over to the GitHub repository https://github.com/juju/layer-index.
Hosting the index in GitHub provides better discoverability for layers, a
better workflow for contributing layers, including more
The new bundle stuff is very useful, thanks Juju devs!
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Burton Swan
wrote:
> ## New and Improved
>
> * The remove-machine command has a --keep-instance flag which allows the
> cloud instance to be left running when the machine is removed
Hey Burton,
Where can I find the docs on these new bundle options (include-file and
include-base64) and the --bundle-config option?
Have a nice weekend
--
Sandor Zeestraten
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Burton Swan
wrote:
> ## New and Improved
>
> * The
## New and Improved
* The remove-machine command has a --keep-instance flag which allows the
cloud instance to be left running when the machine is removed from the Juju
model
* Bundles can now reference local resources by specifying a relative path
(as can already be done for local charms).
*
10 matches
Mail list logo