Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

2017-09-08 Thread Cory Johns
Keep in mind that the charm-build update is really more housekeeping to allow us to retire the old interfaces.juju.solutions domain entirely. All charm builds should now be using the new repo. But of course testing of that change is more than welcome. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Marco Ceppi

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

2017-09-08 Thread Marco Ceppi
This seems to have landed in candidate already, for those wanting to test on something other than edge. sudo snap refresh charm --channel candidate On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! > >

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

2017-09-08 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Cory Johns wrote: > Greetings, > > Today we migrated the index of base and interface layers used to build > charms over to the GitHub repository https://github.com/juju/layer-index. >

Re: Charm snap is now strictly confined

2017-09-08 Thread Rick Harding
+1 awesome work folks. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:49 PM Tim Van Steenburgh < tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > >> good effort devs! >> > > +1, thanks Cory. > > >> >> On 8 Sep 2017 7:42 pm, "Cory Johns"

Re: Charm snap is now strictly confined

2017-09-08 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > good effort devs! > +1, thanks Cory. > > On 8 Sep 2017 7:42 pm, "Cory Johns" wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I just wanted to make a quick announcement that the charm snap is now >> strictly

Charm snap is now strictly confined

2017-09-08 Thread Cory Johns
Greetings, I just wanted to make a quick announcement that the charm snap is now strictly confined on the stable channel (rev 17). This fixes issues like https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/339 and https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/319 and prevents similar issues from cropping up

Charm layer index now on GitHub

2017-09-08 Thread Cory Johns
Greetings, Today we migrated the index of base and interface layers used to build charms over to the GitHub repository https://github.com/juju/layer-index. Hosting the index in GitHub provides better discoverability for layers, a better workflow for contributing layers, including more

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.3!

2017-09-08 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
The new bundle stuff is very useful, thanks Juju devs! On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Burton Swan wrote: > ## New and Improved > > * The remove-machine command has a --keep-instance flag which allows the > cloud instance to be left running when the machine is removed

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.3!

2017-09-08 Thread Sandor Zeestraten
Hey Burton, Where can I find the docs on these new bundle options (include-file and include-base64) and the --bundle-config option? Have a nice weekend -- Sandor Zeestraten On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Burton Swan wrote: > ## New and Improved > > * The

We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.3!

2017-09-08 Thread Burton Swan
## New and Improved * The remove-machine command has a --keep-instance flag which allows the cloud instance to be left running when the machine is removed from the Juju model * Bundles can now reference local resources by specifying a relative path (as can already be done for local charms). *