Re: Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp

I'm also +1 on a timestamp. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Jason Hobbs wrote: > Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate. > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef

Re: Statistics and metrics about Charm, layer and interface usage

I meant to follow up with this last week but lost track. In addition to the raw API for getting charm content, you can also just do `charm pull $CHARM_ID` to get the archive zip, in case that's easier. For charm stats, the API docs that Rick linked to includes the "stats" endpoint. You can see

Re: Charm layer index now on GitHub

teenbu...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Fantastic, this is a great change - well done! >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Today we migrated the index of base and in

Charm snap is now strictly confined

Greetings, I just wanted to make a quick announcement that the charm snap is now strictly confined on the stable channel (rev 17). This fixes issues like https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/339 and https://github.com/juju/charm-tools/issues/319 and prevents similar issues from cropping up

Charm layer index now on GitHub

Greetings, Today we migrated the index of base and interface layers used to build charms over to the GitHub repository https://github.com/juju/layer-index. Hosting the index in GitHub provides better discoverability for layers, a better workflow for contributing layers, including more

New release of python-libjuju

The 0.6.0 release of the Python bindings for the Juju API is now available on PyPI. The docs have moved to ReadTheDocs, due to PythonHosted being deprecated, and the change log can be found at: https://pythonlibjuju.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html Here is a synopsis of the recent

Re: Maximum AllWatcher frame size?

al > // with x/net/websocket connections that don't deal with recieving > // fragmented messages. > const websocketFrameSize = 65536 > > > On 14/06/17 12:00, Cory Johns wrote: > > Do we know what size the gorilla/websocket library uses for automatic > > chunking? > >

Re: Maximum AllWatcher frame size?

nk we do any internal "well that > would be too much information so we wont send it all". > > John > =:-> > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju/issues/136 ra

Maximum AllWatcher frame size?

https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju/issues/136 raises the issue that, for large models, the initial AllWatcher response frame can be large enough that it overruns the default maximum frame size of the websocket library (1MB). We can increase this limit fairly easily, but I wanted to find out

Re: Leadership Election Tools

I think that's another nail in the coffin for @hook. You could work around it by having your @hook('upgrade-charm') handler unconditionally set a state (e.g., 'upgrade-charm'), and then have the state handler do the gating on leadership. This would also allow you to use the decorators for gating

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

Marco, What is the issue you mentioned with using snaps where you mentioned needing an "unconfined classic snap"? On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM Casey Marshall < > casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Thu,

Re: New helper library for unit-testing charms

Free, This looks fantastic! Can I request that you cross-post this over to the main Juju mailing list, as it would be very helpful for the community as a whole? On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Free Ekanayaka < free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I published a couple of new

Re: New feature for 1.26 (master), $(JUJU_HOME)/aliases

You can accomplish most of this with the existing plugin system. You can't override existing commands, but you can easily create thin wrappers around them with your desired default args, and given the discussion around --no-aliases, it seems like this is actually a benefit. And plugins provide

Juju Resources (a tool / library)

Hi all, (cross-posting to juju juju-dev) I've created a tool / library for organizing and managing resources (binary blobs, tarballs, Python packages, and, eventually, apt packages) required by a charm. The idea is to be an interim tool, and a test-bed for the resource features that have been

Re: Bundles proposal

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Richard Harding rick.hard...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Benjamin Saller wrote: Haven't we talked about this type of content as a different data type though than a bundle? Is this something we should work towards at this time? I think that is