Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an > extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all > eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused,

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
This is good stuff. I think keeping it focused on Juju 2.0 and later, completely free of legacy shims, is a good thing. I'd love to be using this natively instead of the collective stack of [Amulet + Juju-deployer + python-jujuclient], and plan to take it for a spin. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Nov

[ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
Hi everyone, We've been working on a new python client for Juju. It's still in development, but we wanted to share the first bits to illicit feedback: https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju Features of this library include: * fully asynchronous - uses asyncio and async/await features of python