Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-14 Thread Cheryl Jennings
Hi Everyone, Due to a critical bug [0] found in the daily PPA, the release of 2.0-beta9 will be delayed while we test the fix. We are aiming for a release tomorrow. Thanks! -Cheryl [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1592210 On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Cheryl Jennings <

Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-14 Thread Aaron Bentley
On 2016-06-13 09:35 AM, Ian Booth wrote: > $ juju set-model-config foo=bar > > That sets foo on the current model. Or > > $ juju -m mymodel set-model-config foo=bar > > operates on model mymodel. > > The above are model commands. So we need a way to set foo=bar on the > controller > itself

Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-14 Thread John Meinel
For JAAS, doesn't a 'default model property' need to be a user level setting, because it doesn't make sense as at a Controller level because all-of-JAAS is your Controller (we don't expose the individual controllers). We should also consider how Migration is impacted by defaults like this. John

Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 14/06/16 08:33, Ian Booth wrote: >> That's why I prefer: >> >> set-controller-config >> set-model-config >> set-model-default >> > I like the above too. But some folks we've talked to have thought that > introducing 3 commands (the ones above) is cognitive overhead. Heh. Ian, if you like,