Re: Juju snap edge channel enabled

On 16/08/16 15:01, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Following up on Ian's work to remove the need for --upload-tools, I've > enabled daily publishing to the edge channel for the juju snap. The > snap utilizes this work so the snap 'just works' as expected. A new > snap is generated and published once a

Juju snap edge channel enabled

Following up on Ian's work to remove the need for --upload-tools, I've enabled daily publishing to the edge channel for the juju snap. The snap utilizes this work so the snap 'just works' as expected. A new snap is generated and published once a day so you'll always have the latest changes. Make

Re: Faster LXD bootstraps and provisioning

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:30 PM John Meinel wrote: > ... >> > > >> +### tuple ### allow any 8000 0.0.0.0/0 any 0.0.0.0/0 in >> +-A ufw-user-input -p tcp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT >> +-A ufw-user-input -p udp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT >> + >> >> > If I'm reading this one

Re: Latest new about Juju master branch - upload-tools obsoleted

On 2016-08-15 08:27 AM, Ian Booth wrote: > Please let me know if there's any questions. --upload-tools is still supported > but will be removed soon. Has --upload-tools already been removed? The lack of it appears to be breaking gui tests:

Re: Faster LXD bootstraps and provisioning

I decided it'd be easier & safer to host squid-deb-proxy in a LXD container rather than the host. My host doesn't route inbound to LXD from other networks, and all the Juju machines can see it. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:30 AM, John Meinel wrote: > ... >> > > >> +###

Re: Latest new about Juju master branch - upload-tools obsoleted

This seems really nice, but I'm slightly wary of "magic" heuristics like this. In particular, bootstrapping can take a while and I have wasted plenty of time in the past trying to find bugs but having bootstrapped using the wrong binary... So I'm hoping this new feature provides at least these