Re: Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp

Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > +1 > > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel > : >> >> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: >>

Re: Juju 2.2-rc2 has been released

(2.3-alpha1) and now are being > published again. > > Nicholas > > On 06/12/2017 11:18 AM, Jason Hobbs wrote: > >> I noticed that for the juju snap, edge and beta channels have older >> releases than candidate. Shouldn't they always be at least the same >> ve

Re: Juju 2.2-rc2 has been released

I noticed that for the juju snap, edge and beta channels have older releases than candidate. Shouldn't they always be at least the same version as candidate, if not newer? stable:2.1.3 (1922) 24MB classic candidate: 2.2-rc2 (1929) 25MB classic beta:

Re: upcoming change in Juju 2.0 to bootstrap arguments

Thanks for the heads up Ian - we will adjust our scripts to accomodate. Jason On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Ian Booth wrote: > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1632919 > > The order of the cloud/region and controller name arguments will be > swapped. > >

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

, also seeing that. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jason Hobbs jason.ho...@canonical.com wrote: ... Thanks,https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju:devel:tools.sjson or https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.sjson