Re: Feature flag for a provider?

2015-04-23 Thread Wayne Witzel
I don't ever see us moving a provider back behind a feature flag after we move it out from one, but I agree with the point. If a user was using a devel version and in a release, we moved a provider behind a flag, they would stop working and their bootstrapped environment would be stuck

Re: Feature flag for a provider?

2015-04-23 Thread Aaron Bentley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2015-04-23 12:27 AM, John Meinel wrote: Thinking it through a bit more, I wonder if that is the best option. Because if someone is already bootstrapped on CloudSigma you really don't have any reason for it to not support CloudSigma. It is just

Re: Feature flag for a provider?

2015-04-22 Thread Aaron Bentley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2015-04-22 09:00 AM, Wayne Witzel wrote: I've been told to place cloudsigma provider behind a feature flag, but the result of that is that the provider is not registered unless the env variable for cloudsigma is set. So after wrapping

Feature flag for a provider?

2015-04-22 Thread Wayne Witzel
I've been told to place cloudsigma provider behind a feature flag, but the result of that is that the provider is not registered unless the env variable for cloudsigma is set. So after wrapping the registration of the provider in the feature flag (see: https://github.com/juju/juju/commit

Re: Feature flag for a provider?

2015-04-22 Thread John Meinel
cloudsigma provider behind a feature flag, but the result of that is that the provider is not registered unless the env variable for cloudsigma is set. So after wrapping the registration of the provider in the feature flag (see: https://github.com/juju/juju/commit