Can we try reviews on github for a couple weeks? Seems like we'll never
know if it's sufficient if we don't try it. And there's no setup cost,
which is nice.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:44 PM Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I see quite a few PRs that are being
I see quite a few PRs that are being reviewed in GitHub and not ReviewBoard. I
really don't care where we do them, but can we please pick a direction and move
forward? And until then, can we stick to our previous decision and use RB? With
people using both it's much more difficult to tell
Thanks, Mark! By interactive bootstrap, do you mean interactive
add-credentials? If so, I think it already exists for RAX, but isn't quite spot
on yet. It looks like I should be able to get bootstrapped with the information
contained in the bug link in Rick's response.
~James
> On Sep 19,
Awesome! Thanks!
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Rick Harding wrote:
>
> James, what good timing. The streams with image info is just going through
> getting setup.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1625243
>
> It took a bit for the images for
Seems like a good thing to do would be to ensure the tech board doesn't have
any objections and then put it to a vote since it's more a property of the team
and not the codebase.
I just want some consistency until a decision is made. E.g. "we will be trying
out GitHub reviews for the next two
I spoke with Alexis today about this and it's on her list to check with her
folks on this. The tech board has been tasked with he decision, so please
feel free to shoot a copy of your opinions their way. As you say, on the
one hand it's a big impact on the team, but it's also a standard developer
Personally, I really enjoy having everything in the same place, more than I
expected. It's also one less barrier of entry for newcomers and outsiders.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, 5:54 PM Menno Smits wrote:
> (gah, hit send too early)
>
> ... If we decide to stay with RB,
(gah, hit send too early)
... If we decide to stay with RB, that will need to be fixed.
On 21 September 2016 at 09:53, Menno Smits
wrote:
> Some of us probably got a little excited (me included). There should be
> discussion and a clear announcement before we make a
On 19/09/16 23:36, James Beedy wrote:
> Thanks, Mark! By interactive bootstrap, do you mean interactive
> add-credentials? If so, I think it already exists for RAX, but isn't quite
> spot on yet. It looks like I should be able to get bootstrapped with the
> information contained in the bug link
A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc1, is here!
## What's New in RC1
* The Juju client now works on any Linux flavour. When bootstrapping
with local tools, it's now possible to create a controller of any
supported Linux series regardless of the Linux flavour the client
is running on.
10 matches
Mail list logo