Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Free Ekanayaka
On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard > wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: >> >> On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Free Ekanayaka
On 1 December 2016 at 14:39, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka < > free.ekanay...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 13:53, Marco Ceppi > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard > wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Aaron Bentley
I hope that as you implement this, you avoid making fat charms. Can you use "resources" for this? Aaron On 2016-12-01 08:39 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:28 AM Free Ekanayaka > > wrote: > > On 1 December

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Casey Marshall
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard > wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: >> >> On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the

Re: Bundle SVG Generator updated

2016-12-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
A quick update: You can now put in a bundle URL from the charm store in addition to a raw HTTP address to get an SVG/PNG/PDF/XML render. Examples on the homepage have been updated, they're repeated here for your convenience: http://svg.juju.solutions/?bundle=openstack-telemetry

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM Casey Marshall wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Cory Johns
Marco, What is the issue you mentioned with using snaps where you mentioned needing an "unconfined classic snap"? On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM Casey Marshall < > casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Thu,

Fwd: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Adam Collard
Oops, forgot to reply to the list. -- Forwarded message - From: Adam Collard Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 13:43 Subject: Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm To: Marco Ceppi On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 12:53 Marco Ceppi

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Nate Finch
So, the whole point of my original email was to say - if you want a minimal charm, just make one, it's easy. I just published my above mentioned minimal charm as cs:~natefinch/nop It's not showing up on jujucharms.com, maybe because charm proof is failing because it's missing everything except

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Adam Collard
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of Juju's features. My response was - just make a minimal charm, it's easy. And then of

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: > > On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the Ubuntu charm takes longer > to deploy now, because it has been updated to exercise more of

Re: A (Very) Minimal Charm

2016-12-01 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 1 December 2016 at 19:53, Marco Ceppi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM Adam Collard > wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 04:02 Nate Finch wrote: >> >> On IRC, someone was lamenting the fact that the