Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread John Meinel
I just wanted to note that some of the reason for 128GB was because 2.0 and 2.1 did leak memory over time. And if you have a leak you will always eventually run out. In 2.2 we've fixed all the ones we've found so far and we're actively doing some performance measuring to give better guidelines.

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:58:30 +0100 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines > > (e.g. 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't > > be easy for them to have an extra

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:09:14 + Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits > wrote: > > > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use > > MongoDB from snap instead of a deb. This would

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines (e.g. > 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't be easy for > them to have an extra machine to setup a new controller and run model > migration, if their controller is HA