Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-08-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 31 July 2017 at 20:24, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 31/07/17 01:34, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > On 23 June 2017 at 11:47, Menno Smits wrote: > >> We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use MongoDB >> from snap instead of

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-31 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 31/07/17 01:34, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On 23 June 2017 at 11:47, Menno Smits > wrote: > > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use > MongoDB from snap instead of a deb. This would make it

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 23 June 2017 at 11:47, Menno Smits wrote: > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use MongoDB > from snap instead of a deb. This would make it easier for Juju to stay up > to date with the latest MongoDB releases, avoiding the involved process

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread John Meinel
I just wanted to note that some of the reason for 128GB was because 2.0 and 2.1 did leak memory over time. And if you have a leak you will always eventually run out. In 2.2 we've fixed all the ones we've found so far and we're actively doing some performance measuring to give better guidelines.

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:58:30 +0100 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines > > (e.g. 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't > > be easy for them to have an extra

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Felipe Reyes
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:09:14 + Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits > wrote: > > > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use > > MongoDB from snap instead of a deb. This would

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-07-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 26/07/17 15:51, Felipe Reyes wrote: > Some users run the controller in fairly big bare metal machines (e.g. > 128G of RAM, I've seen even bigger controllers) and it won't be easy for > them to have an extra machine to setup a new controller and run model > migration, if their controller is HA

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-26 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Hi everybody, Thanks for highlighting this in a public thread. Before switching to snaps, please consider mongodb lifetime as snapd does not give you any strict lifetime guarantees as of now: 1. it will try to stop a service on update; 2. will send SIGTERM if that timed out; 3. if processes in

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-24 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Menno Smits wrote: > > > On 23 June 2017 at 12:09, Andrew Wilkins > wrote: > >> >>> *1. Does snapd work on all architectures that Juju supports?* >>> >>> The answer appears to be "yes with some caveats".

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-23 Thread Danilo Šegan
У пет, 23. 06 2017. у 00:09 +, Andrew Wilkins пише: > > One issue would be upgrades: we would either have to continue > supporting both snaps and debs for mongodb, or we would have to > disallow upgrading from a system that doesn't support snaps. That > would OK as long as there are no

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-22 Thread Menno Smits
On 23 June 2017 at 12:25, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >>> The answer appears to be "yes with some caveats". For xenial onwards >>> there are snapd packages for all the architectures the Juju team cares >>> about. >>> >> >> Ah, I thought the question was rather

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-22 Thread Menno Smits
On 23 June 2017 at 12:09, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > >> *1. Does snapd work on all architectures that Juju supports?* >> >> The answer appears to be "yes with some caveats". For xenial onwards >> there are snapd packages for all the architectures the Juju team cares >>

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 23 June 2017 at 12:09, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits > wrote: > >> We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use MongoDB >> from snap instead of a deb. This would make it easier

Re: Consuming MongoDB from a Snap

2017-06-22 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:47 AM Menno Smits wrote: > We've had some discussion this week about whether Juju could use MongoDB > from snap instead of a deb. This would make it easier for Juju to stay up > to date with the latest MongoDB releases, avoiding the involved