Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

What did we end up doing for Login? I'm thinking it would be good to keep a v1 login around that would tell <=1.25 clients that they need a different version of their client to talk to this server. John =:-> On Feb 3, 2016 9:03 PM, "Eric Snow" wrote: > Thanks for this

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Yeah, there's a couple of places that need a bit of cleanup. With that one, I needed to double check existing call points before deleting, and ran out of time before needing to do the merge. But the intent is to delete it. On 03/02/16 12:53, Nate Finch wrote: > FYI, I noticed

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Very exciting to see these bits landing now! I'm looking forward to the alpha and trying out all the commands On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:05 AM Ian Booth wrote: > Yeah, there's a couple of places that need a bit of cleanup. With that > one, I > needed to double check

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

FYI, I noticed ServiceDeployWithNetworks still exists as a client and facade method, but it's only called by tests. Maybe it should be removed? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016, 8:34 PM Ian Booth wrote: > Hey all > > As has been mentioned previously in this list, for the Juju 2.0