Re: Squelching Leadership messages

2017-01-17 Thread Adam Collard
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 15:51 Katherine Cox-Buday < katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote: > John A Meinel writes: > > > Note that we should still report leadership changes at INFO level, which > should allow you to > > debug easy things without changing the log

Re: Squelching Leadership messages

2017-01-13 Thread Katherine Cox-Buday
John A Meinel writes: > Note that we should still report leadership changes at INFO level, which > should allow you to > debug easy things without changing the log level, as those changes should > happen very > rarely. +1, thanks for this! -- Katherine --

Squelching Leadership messages

2017-01-13 Thread John A Meinel
I just proposed 2 branches, one for 2.1 and one for develop. So that the "will renew leadership" message that triggers every 30s is dropped to DEBUG level instead of INFO level. That should make those logs have a much higher signal to noise ratio. But I want to make sure that if anyone is trying