That is a case of e being overloaded. It helps with the OP's issue though.
For the scientific notation issue I would suggest choosing which is more
useful, natural e or using e for a base ten exponent.
On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:22:11 PM UTC-6, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015
https://developer.gnome.org/gdk3/stable/gdk3-Events.html#gdk-event-request-motions
I've generally found the manual to have better information than the
tutorials. Specifically, the tutorials generally don't seem to get updated
as Gtk evolves (esp. those not hosted on the gnome site).
That's
This is a little confusing since it seems to be a question about Matlab.
Did you mean to ask about how to do k-means clustering in Julia?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Eng Noor engnoo...@gmail.com wrote:
How to Perform a K-means Clustering in matlab and use it to select
acluster head ???
Yup, that's the one, my bad
On 5 January 2015 at 18:35, Samuel Colvin s...@muelcolvin.com wrote:
Great thanks a lot, now working.
--
Samuel Colvin
s...@muelcolvin.com,
07801160713
On 5 January 2015 at 18:32, Jacob Quinn quinn.jac...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it should actually be:
To eliminate the ambiguity, one would have to disallow all variable names
that start with the letter e. At which point, one might as well go all
the way and just disallow using e altogether and rename the language to
Gadsby.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Peter Mancini pe...@cicayda.com wrote:
Does this mean you suggest to disallow variables names 'e', 'f', 'p' (and
possibly
others) in a programming environment for scientific computing? Hard to
believe.
On Monday, January 5, 2015 7:41:49 PM UTC+1, Peter Mancini wrote:
That is a case of e being overloaded. It helps with the OP's
No. I'm tongue in cheek pointing out the absurdity of the situation.
On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:57:45 PM UTC-6, Hans W Borchers wrote:
Does this mean you suggest to disallow variables names 'e', 'f', 'p' (and
possibly
others) in a programming environment for scientific computing? Hard to
The difference could be the BLAS. MATLAB comes with its own BLAS library,
and the performance
of the BLAS has a huge impact on the performance of UMFPACK, particularly
for 3D discretizations.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Ehsan Eftekhari e.eftekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm solving diffusion
hi kevin---I would be happy to open an issue, but I would prefer if
the honor was left to someone (you?) who can articulate it better.
I am a true novice here.
if I understand it right, the fix is easy. is a Handle change
complex and/or needed? just overload all functions that expect a Pipe
to
documentation is a tricky thing. I am pretty sure you do *not* want
me to make doc changes.
I am very qualified to state exactly where I am getting confused and
where it could be better. alas, if I tried to write it, I would write
incorrect explanation, which would probably be worse. so, this
On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:09:41 AM UTC-5, Kevin Squire wrote:
FWIW, I believe that there was concern that the behavior of open(process)
might cause confusion when it was defined in this way. (A quick search
didn't locate the issue.)
See the discussion at
I am very qualified to state exactly where I am getting confused and
where it could be better. alas, if I tried to write it, I would write
incorrect explanation, which would probably be worse. so, this needs
one person who is learning it (the consumer) and one person who is
teaching it (the
It seems perhaps that each Process instance should remember its IO streams,
so that it could be used directly as an IO object.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:32 PM Steven G. Johnson stevenj@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:09:41 AM UTC-5, Kevin Squire wrote:
FWIW, I believe that
Have you seen https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/8987?
There is also an issue filed:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/9617
-viral
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 12:29:33 AM UTC+5:30, Peter Mancini wrote:
No. I'm tongue in cheek pointing out the absurdity of the situation.
On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:57:45 PM UTC-6, Hans W Borchers
Simon,
Thanks for looking into that!
Steven, what are your plans for bumping PyCall to the next version number?
Best,
John
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 6:39:33 PM UTC-5, Simon Kornblith wrote:
https://github.com/stevengj/PyCall.jl/pull/110
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 9:34:14 AM UTC-5, John
Oh, and, (I forgot to mention!) the Julia code runs much faster.
On Monday, January 5, 2015 3:56:07 PM UTC+1, lapeyre@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, here is a comparison of Julia and C++ for simulating a random walk
https://github.com/jlapeyre/ranwalk-Julia-vs-Cxx.
It is the first Julia program
Whoops, slight bug in the build script. A Pkg.update() (possibly followed
by Pkg.build(Blink), if it doesn't happen automatically) should fix you
up.
On 5 January 2015 at 15:02, Rob J. Goedman goed...@icloud.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Tried it a couple of times, but run into below error, in REPL.
Nice work!
I was just thinking about julia integration with atom-shell this morning.
I'm excited to see where this goes.
Very neat. Just in case this gets posted to the interwebz, it is worth
pointing out that the performance advantage for Julia can probably be
explained by differences in the underlying RNG. We use dsFMT, which is
known to be one of (if not the?) fastest MT libraries around. I could not
find any
just noticed that Tamas already recommended that above. Just to reiterate I
think this is the better way to resolve this particular issue.
Christoph
On Monday, 5 January 2015 15:04:27 UTC, Eric Forgy wrote:
Maybe its not so bad if you just always include * where it should be, i.e.
p = 1;
Tim - thanks for the reference. The paper will come in handy. This is a
longstanding issue, that we just haven’t got around to addressing yet, but
perhaps now is a good time.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3295
We have a very simplistic factorize() for sparse matrices that must have
Thanks, works like a charm.
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:39:27 PM UTC+3, Michael Hatherly wrote:
You can put a REQUIRE file in the test directory that should do what you
want.
— Mike
On Sunday, 4 January 2015 21:33:37 UTC+2, Andrei Zh wrote:
I have a package A that has file-based
Ok. It's done. Just to be sure I understood what I read on a github forum;
there is no way for me to attach a label to the PR. So the labels are
always added by someone else ?
--John
On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:25:18 PM UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote:
Thanks. Do create a PR.
-viral
On
oops. Yes, your factorize function is broken. You might try mine instead,
in my
factorize package.
I have a symmetry-checker in CHOLMOD. It checks if the matrix is symmetric
and
with positive diagonals. I think I have a MATLAB interface for it too.
The code is efficient,
since it doesn't form
Tim , thx for hints, but do not work without this line
#fid[mygroup/A]=rand(2)
becouse I vave not g , and nothing to declare in this line /dset =
d_create(g, F, datatype(Float64), dataspace(10,10))/
/
dset = d_create( F, datatype(Float64), dataspace(10,10))/
do not work ...
Paul
using
I believe the labels can only be attached by those who have read/write access.
-viral
On 06-Jan-2015, at 2:20 am, lapeyre.math1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. It's done. Just to be sure I understood what I read on a github forum;
there is no way for me to attach a label to the PR. So the
Thanks, that is great. I was wondering about the symmetry checker - we have the
naive one currently, but I can just use the CHOLMOD one now.
-viral
On 06-Jan-2015, at 2:22 am, Tim Davis da...@tamu.edu wrote:
oops. Yes, your factorize function is broken. You might try mine instead,
in
Good. This is fine with me.Thanks.
--John
On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:52:58 PM UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote:
I believe the labels can only be attached by those who have read/write
access.
-viral
On 06-Jan-2015, at 2:20 am, lapeyre@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Ok. It's done.
Following your advice, I tried the code again, this time I also used MUMPS
solver from https://github.com/lruthotto/MUMPS.jl
I used a 42x43x44 grid. These are the results:
MUMPS: elapsed time: 2.09091471 seconds
lufact: elapsed time: 5.01038297 seconds (9952832 bytes allocated)
backslash:
First, keep in mind that nothing gets committed without review, unless you
already have push privileges.
In the absence of being able to actually construct the change, I like the idea
of tagging things that need fixing. You can do that just by editing the
document to say This needs to be
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
