[julia-users] Re: CoinOptServices

2016-10-27 Thread Frank Kampas
I removed CoinOptServices and WinRPM and was then able to add CoinOptServices

[julia-users] Re: CoinOptServices

2016-10-26 Thread Frank Kampas
Handle or Dll substring "liblapack" returned 0 matching items

[julia-users] Re: CoinOptServices

2016-10-26 Thread Frank Kampas
Process Explorer does not indicate that lapack is being run when the problem occurs. I do have mingw installed elsewhere on my computer.

[julia-users] Re: CoinOptServices

2016-10-26 Thread Frank Kampas
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 9:01:29 AM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: > > Is anybody working on fixing CoinOptServices? > the problem occurs when nothing else is open. I see on the GitHub page for CoinOptServices that the build is failing for Windows and Linux.

[julia-users] Re: CoinOptServices

2016-10-25 Thread Frank Kampas
When I run Pkg.build("CoinOptServices") using Julia 5.0 and Windows 10, I get load errors and a build error message. On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 9:01:29 AM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: > > Is anybody working on fixing CoinOptServices? >

[julia-users] CoinOptServices

2016-10-25 Thread Frank Kampas
Is anybody working on fixing CoinOptServices?

Re: [julia-users] speed comparison with Mathematica

2015-09-18 Thread Frank Kampas
I had assumed the function would be recompiled only if it had been changed, but that is not correct. This has been very useful, thanks to everybody to replied. On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 10:39:13 PM UTC-4, Duane Wilson wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 5:25:40 PM UTC-3,

[julia-users] speed comparison with Mathematica

2015-09-17 Thread Frank Kampas
On julialang.org, it is stated that Julia is about 170 times faster than Mathematica for the the test "fib". I get about a factor 2. Julia: fib(n) = n < 2 ? n : fib(n-1) + fib(n-2) println(@time(fib(20))) elapsed time: 0.001868071 seconds (33280 bytes allocated) 6765 Mathematica: In[1]:=

Re: [julia-users] speed comparison with Mathematica

2015-09-17 Thread Frank Kampas
Also note that the @time macro is doing the printing, so you don't need > the parentheses or the println() call for this. > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Frank Kampas <fka...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> On julialang.org, it is stated that Julia is about 170 times fast

[julia-users] Re: higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-16 Thread Frank Kampas
ll nonzero > triplets (i,j,value), y[j] += x[i] * value. > > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 8:52:46 AM UTC-7, Frank Kampas wrote: >> >> Could you post a link to the part of the documentation that describes how >> to do that? >> >> On Tuesday, Septembe

[julia-users] Re: higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-15 Thread Frank Kampas
Could you post a link to the part of the documentation that describes how to do that? On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 3:53:11 AM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Instead of constructing a sparse matrix in the inner loop it would be more > efficient to write an in place stencil kernel function to

[julia-users] Re: higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-13 Thread Frank Kampas
he messy transformations. > > > On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 3:15:34 PM UTC-7, Frank Kampas wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 12:09:11 PM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to create sparse matrices w

[julia-users] Re: higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-13 Thread Frank Kampas
With 4th rank sparse matrices, I could define them outside the loop. On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 12:09:11 PM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: > > Is it possible to create sparse matrices with a rank other than 2? >

[julia-users] Re: higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-12 Thread Frank Kampas
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 12:09:11 PM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: > > Is it possible to create sparse matrices with a rank other than 2? > I've been using 4th rank sparse matrices in Mathematica for circle packing. The constraints can be expressed using 2nd rank

[julia-users] higher rank sparse matrices

2015-09-12 Thread Frank Kampas
Is it possible to create sparse matrices with a rank other than 2?

[julia-users] Re: JuliaCon 2015 videos

2015-08-18 Thread Frank Kampas
The optimization video is private On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote: Folks, I am happy to announce that the videos are almost all ready, and I will start posting them in batches. I am starting with Jeff’s talk on our Youtube channel:

[julia-users] Re: calling Julia from Mathematica

2015-04-07 Thread Frank Kampas
I've used LibraryLink to call Ipopt from Mathematica but haven't succeeded in calling Julia from C under Windows, which would be required to use LibraryLink. On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 9:25:04 AM UTC-4, Frank Kampas wrote: Has anyone been able to call Julia from Mathematica?

[julia-users] calling Julia from Mathematica

2015-04-02 Thread Frank Kampas
Has anyone been able to call Julia from Mathematica?

[julia-users] Re: Julia cannot compute factorial(21) while Octave can

2015-01-16 Thread Frank Kampas
factorial(BigInt(21)) works On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 10:10:06 PM UTC-5, Carlos Baptista wrote: I understand that factorial(21) is quite a large number and therefore an OverflowError is perfectly understandable. However, with Octave I can go up to factorial(170) (if I go higher I

[julia-users] Re: Julia vs C++-11 for random walks

2015-01-06 Thread Frank Kampas
Microsoft C code is not very fast these days. You might want to compare with MinGW. On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:56:07 AM UTC-5, lapeyre@gmail.com wrote: Hi, here is a comparison of Julia and C++ for simulating a random walk https://github.com/jlapeyre/ranwalk-Julia-vs-Cxx. It is the