Thanks very much here as well.
I do all my technical work within Eclipse -- mostly Java and R (StatET
plugin that I find great).
So being able to access Julia from within Eclipse will make it more
convenient for me to use Julia -- an additional incentive to use Julia
instead of R.
I am super
May the force be with Keno team! Thank you for what you have been doing
to the benefit of all of us.
Le dimanche 22 février 2015 06:46:41 UTC-5, Tim Holy a écrit :
As in not soon enough :-).
But it's an extremely hard problem that involves an enormous amount of
infrastructure, including
Holy smoky, this loop flies now! Thanks so much to everyone who contributed
to help, awesome feedback.
Following are a few comments from my further tests with enclosed my current
fastest version:
- In my script on the global scope, I can define a type, but I cannot
defined it const.
Profiling shows incrementing integers by 1 (i += 1) being the bottleneck.
Within the same loop are other statements that do take much less time.
In my performance optimizing zeal, I over typed the hell out of everything
to attempt squeezing performance to the last once.
Some of this zeal did
happens if you replace the literal
1 with one(T) for the type you're working with?
-- John
On Sep 18, 2014, at 9:56 AM, G. Patrick Mauroy gpma...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Profiling shows incrementing integers by 1 (i += 1) being the bottleneck.
Within the same loop are other
the impression the loop construct
for i in 1:n
was slower than
while i =n
But I need to run further tests to determine whether it is indeed so or not.
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:44:58 PM UTC-4, G. Patrick Mauroy wrote:
No change.
I over typed everything to avoid such type mismatches
I have a Julia code file containing the definition of a function I want to
profile, setting up test data, and running a function call (actually 2
calls, one to compile the function, and one to actually measure its
performance, and optionally a third call to profile it).
So my Julia test code
Thanks Daniel. I will then next run it on Linux...
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:09:03 AM UTC-4, Daniel Høegh wrote:
This is a known issue on windows it is fixed on the master and is coming
as in 0.3.1. See issue https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8350
I run Julia 0.3.0-prerelease on Windows 7 64.
I am trying to install Sublime-IJulia that I would like to evaluate, looks
like exactly what I am looking for as an IDE.
I went through all the install steps
https://github.com/quinnj/Sublime-IJulia.
I keep on getting the dreaded ***Kernel Died***.
Personally, I would not want them all. I would find it useful to start
with the most commonly used ones, even if the commonly used list contains a
few more than I really want need, as long as not too many.
Then, I would further want to easily be able to define, install and then
later update
I think it is great to have most topics advanced, it is a fun and
educational way to engage with contributors and see all the power of the
language in action.
However if one of the objectives of the conference is also to broaden a bit
the audience -- e.g., spark the interest of a few more
Will the conference target Julia experts with only advanced topics or will
it be appropriate/beneficial to newcomers and prospective ones who are
tempted but perhaps a bit skittish?
I would find it useful if there was a little abstract for each
presentation. I understand it might be early for
stack
them and output them to the same pdf like:
using Gadfly
x = [1,2,3]
plot1 = plot(x = x, y = x + 3)
plot2 = plot(x = x, y = 2 * x + 1)
draw(PDF(plotJ.pdf, 6inch, 6inch), vstack(plot1, plot2))
On Friday, February 7, 2014 8:35:57 AM UTC-8, G. Patrick Mauroy wrote:
Just starting taking
I just started learning about ggplot grammar. I was reluctant at first but
now I understand the basics, it makes sense, I find it well design: one can
do simple and complex graphics in the same consistent way. This is the ggplot
tutorial http://www.cookbook-r.com/Graphs/ I have used.
I find
14 matches
Mail list logo
