Re: [julia-users] Re: String printout in REPL vs println()

"But in most languages print+string is mainly used in situations where quotes are noise, like user-directed output or printing text to a file. (exlangs. c, lisp, java, python, javascript...)" -that's a good point... On 26 September 2016 at 15:56, Fábio Cardeal wrote: > No

Re: [julia-users] Re: String printout in REPL vs println()

Thanks. I can also use typeof(), i just somehow assumed that strings would print as "strings" by default... Cheers! On 26 September 2016 at 15:17, Fábio Cardeal wrote: > "Any reason?" > "None that I can think of..." > "But you can use *show *if you need 'em" > "You'll need

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia NetCDF usage of subsetting with start and count

Thanks, you were right! The synthax is working. I have no idea what was the problem (i was out of office since then) but it did persist for enough time that i posted it on the forum... Anyway, thanks again! On 17 September 2016 at 13:27, Martijn Visser wrote: > The syntax

Re: [julia-users] Re: Vector Field operators (gradient, divergence, curl) in Julia

Thank you all! On 14 September 2016 at 00:41, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > Both ForwardDiff and ReverseDiff source solve a different problem (taking > the derivative of a user-supplied function f(x)). The Matlab and NumPy > gradient functions, instead, take an array (not a

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia Low Pass Filter much slower than identical code in Python ??

Makes sense, thanks :-) On 12 September 2016 at 17:17, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > JIT = Just In Time, i.e. the first time you use the code. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:52 AM, MLicer wrote: > >> Indeed it does! I thought JIT compilation takes place