, January 5, 2015 9:56:12 PM UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote:
Thanks, that is great. I was wondering about the symmetry checker - we
have the naive one currently, but I can just use the CHOLMOD one now.
-viral
On 06-Jan-2015, at 2:22 am, Tim Davis da...@tamu.edu wrote:
oops. Yes, your
packages,
none of which currently meet the cross-platform build system requirements
that Base Julia has.
-Tony
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 1:13:55 PM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
2-clause BSD is basically MIT-equivalent, so that works.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Tim Davis da
, January 6, 2015 12:31:34 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Davis wrote:
The difference could be the BLAS. MATLAB comes with its own BLAS
library, and the performance
of the BLAS has a huge impact on the performance of UMFPACK, particularly
for 3D discretizations.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Ehsan
The difference could be the BLAS. MATLAB comes with its own BLAS library,
and the performance
of the BLAS has a huge impact on the performance of UMFPACK, particularly
for 3D discretizations.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Ehsan Eftekhari e.eftekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm solving diffusion
-viral
On 06-Jan-2015, at 1:57 am, Tim Davis da...@tamu.edu wrote:
That does sound like a glitch in the \ algorithm, rather than in
UMFPACK. The OpenBLAS is pretty good.
This is very nice in Julia:
F = lufact (d[M]) ; F \ d
That's a great idea to have a factorization object like
