I might be wrong here, but you could imagine "unifying" macros and
functions, allowing people to call any function as a macro by prepending a
@, or calling any macro as a function by omitting it.
I don't know whether this would be useful, but it's how I read Ford's
question.
On Sunday, June
Hi all,
I am playing around with image inpainting
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inpainting) using the very simple approach
outlined here: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~bmbowen/papers/inpainting.pdf
The entire algorithm, in pseudocode, is
initialize Ω; // A mask signifying the area of the image
, but
it's
not easy to do so efficiently on julia 0.3.
--Tim
On Saturday, May 02, 2015 04:37:10 PM Yuri Vishnevsky wrote:
Hi all,
I am playing around with image inpainting
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inpainting) using the very simple
approach
outlined here: http
Thanks for the recommendation.
-- Yuri
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:30:13 AM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote:
Your approach is fine, but maybe easier is to use ImageView's canvas grid,
and
then you can use write_to_png(cg, filename).
--Tim
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 07:16:04 PM Yuri
Hi all,
I'm writing code to take a bunch of images and concatenate them into one
big image (you can see the attached picture for an example of what this can
look like).
The code I wrote to generate the above picture is fairly hideous; I arrived
at it after trying a number of approaches that
Hi all,
I'm playing around with some image-related stuff in Julia and am using the
method recommended
herehttp://nbviewer.ipython.org/url/jdj.mit.edu/~stevenj/IJulia%20Preview.ipynb
to
get image data to render as an actual image inside of an IJulia notebook.
I'd like to extend Julia's
Woohoo. Thanks!
On Monday, May 26, 2014 5:03:25 PM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
The text/plain hack you implemented is definitely wrong, and will cause
problems if the writemime function is used in any other context.
You need to decide what MIME type the vector of images will be. The
UTC-4, Yuri Vishnevsky wrote:
I don't know if I'm interpreting the output correctly, but if you look
at at the output from the following it seems that both t and index are
interpreted to be of type Any.
t = MinTreap{Int}(); add!(t, 50)
@code_typed t.root[1]
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 8:27
, that is like 30 bytes per op so its probably not
actually allocating memory in the malloc() sense.
And the memory usage when you are growing it seems proportional too.
How does code_llvm look?
On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:12:47 AM UTC-4, Yuri Vishnevsky wrote:
So I just implemented a version
I'm working on a Julia implementation of a Treap, a data structure that
maintains a sorted collection of elements and allows insertion, deletion,
and random access in O(log n) time (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treap).
So far I've implemented the basic functions, but performance is far slower
.
— John
On May 11, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Yuri Vishnevsky yuri...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'm working on a Julia implementation of a Treap, a data structure that
maintains a sorted collection of elements and allows insertion, deletion,
and random access in O(log n) time (http
it is allocating any memory...
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:59:42 PM UTC-4, Yuri Vishnevsky wrote:
Oddly, that makes it *slower*...
julia benchmark(100)
Timing 100 insert operations.
elapsed time: 11.637004929 seconds (1324768744 bytes allocated)
Timing 100 random access operations
Done: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6813
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 8:52:09 PM UTC-4, Iain Dunning wrote:
Wow, yeah! It sure looks like that. Can you file an issue with this
information?
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 8:38:37 PM UTC-4, Yuri Vishnevsky wrote:
I don't know if I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
