[julia-users] Re: Arrow Keys when debugging

great news ! thanks ! Le lundi 25 avril 2016 16:20:33 UTC+2, Steven G. Johnson a écrit : > > > > That debugger is mostly a stopgap/prototype until we have a "real" > debugger based on LLDB, which allows you to run code at full speed until > you hit a break point. Such a debugger was recently

Re: [julia-users] Re: build issue on v0.4.2

it worked ! RAM requirement for building julia from source is higher than 1Gb. i put 4 Gb

Re: [julia-users] Re: build issue on v0.4.2

my "clients" want to validate the "build & custom" automation before thinking about upgrading. i have no choice :) Le lundi 25 avril 2016 14:51:38 UTC+2, Michele Zaffalon a écrit : > > Would it not be better to update to 0.4.5 first? > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:57 PM,

[julia-users] Re: build issue on v0.4.2

it seems that /home/vagrant/julia-0.4.2/base/precompile.jl crashed because of memory overflow (i watched htop). i'll try the build with more memory on my test virtual machine (500Mb -> 1 Gb). Le lundi 25 avril 2016 13:50:21 UTC+2, ming...@irt-systemx.fr a écrit : > > hello, > > there a build

[julia-users] build issue on v0.4.2

hello, there a build issue on a Vagrant virtual machine (i am actually debugging my Ansible automation) : require.jl docs/helpdb.jl docs/basedocs.jl /home/vagrant/julia-0.4.2/base/precompile.jl Killed *** This error is usually fixed by running `make clean`. If the error persists, try `make

[julia-users] Re: sparse rank, sparse nullspace, sparse linear algebra over rationals?

hello, getting the rank of a huge sparse matrix is mathematically difficult http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/554777/rank-computation-of-large-matrices bests, M. Le lundi 16 novembre 2015 22:12:04 UTC+1, Laurent Bartholdi a écrit : > > Hello world, > I'm new at julia, and trying it out

[julia-users] Re: sparse matrix bug

ok, i guess performance is then improved. however, the conversion between sparse matrix line and sparse vecteor is not correct julia> aa = sparse([10. 0 30.]) 1x3 sparse matrix with 2 Float64 entries: [1, 1] = 10.0 [1, 3] = 30.0 julia> full(aa[1,:]) 3-element Array{Float64,1}:

[julia-users] Re: sparse matrix bug

oops. I have just realized that I messed up with git checkout v0.*** I recompiled the good release (not the development branch). the behavior described above does not happen in v0.4.1 I agree the "packing bug" in dev branch is normal in development stage. I have read

[julia-users] sparse matrix bug

Hello, I have a problem with sparse matrix in Julia 0.5. here is the detailed version number Version 0.5.0-dev+1265 (2015-11-13 08:40 UTC) Commit f045831 (0 days old master) x86_64-linux-gnu here is the sequence of instructions that highlights the bug ; julia> aa = sparse([10. 0 30.]) 1x3