RE: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

+1 I’m also much more interested in a simple install story for an existing Atom installation than a standalone juno bundle. From: julia-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:julia-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tomas Lycken Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 2:39 PM To: julia-users

Re: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

It would be nice, though, if it were somewhere documented - or even better, a meta-package with dependencies on all the others - to allow turning an already existing Atom installation into a Julia IDE *too*. I'd be much more interested in improving an editor I'm already using for other thing,

Re: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

Mike can step in, but I think it is indeed the plan to have a Julia IDE bundle, causing the exact packages required on the julia and atom side to be invisible implementation details from the user's POV. On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 1:27:01 PM UTC-4, David Anthoff wrote: > > I think the user

RE: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

I think the user experience for almost all people would be much easier if they install Atom, then add one package for julia support and everything works. Having multiple Atom packages (julia-language, ink, julia-client, latex-completion and Jude right now) makes things confusing for most

Re: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

Hi David, I think Jude's functionality is pretty orthogonal to julia-client so they function pretty well as distinct, easier to manage packages. julia-client is focused on live code execution and results visualization while Jude is more about getting traditional IDE tools via static syntax

RE: [julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

Very nice! Any chance that this could just become part of julia-client at some point? From: julia-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:julia-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Dang Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:58 AM To: julia-users Subject:

[julia-users] Announcing JuDE: autocomplete and jump to definition support for Atom

Hi All, Julia has been great for me, and I wanted to give back a little. LightTable and Atom are great editors, but I was really starting to miss good intellisense-like autocomplete and basic navigation features like jump-to-definition, especially on larger codebases. It's really quite a slog