If you want a constant field its probable that you would be better served
by type parameter.
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 3:14:15 PM UTC-6, Marcus Urban wrote:
So, does this also mean that it is not possible to have constant fields
inside a composite type?
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:26
Assigning default values to fields of a composite type is not yet supported.
Your inner constructor is also a little un-Julian, since `MyType() = new()`
doesn’t assign any values to those fields.
— John
On Dec 21, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Marcus Urban math...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a little
