[julia-users] Re: ANN: POSIXClock - writing hard real-time Julia code

Hi Uwe, On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:55:28 PM UTC-4, Uwe Fechner wrote: > > I am very happy about your work. I had the hope, that the built-in method > sleep could be improved to reach this level of performance: > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/12770 > > But perhaps it is better to

[julia-users] Re: ANN: POSIXClock - writing hard real-time Julia code

I am very happy about your work. I had the hope, that the built-in method sleep could be improved to reach this level of performance: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/12770 But perhaps it is better to have this in a separate package. Uwe On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 10:07:22 AM UTC+2,

Re: [julia-users] Re: ANN: POSIXClock - writing hard real-time Julia code

Hi Páll, Thanks for your reply. Please see below. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Páll Haraldsson wrote: > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:07:22 AM UTC, Islam Badreldin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm excited to announce the first release of POSIXClock, a package that >>

[julia-users] Re: ANN: POSIXClock - writing hard real-time Julia code

On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:07:22 AM UTC, Islam Badreldin wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm excited to announce the first release of POSIXClock, a package that > provides Julia bindings to clock_*() functions from POSIX real-time > extensions (librt on Linux). > https://github.com/ibadr/POSIXClock.jl >