Thanks Viral and everyone else. I will play with this later this week. :)
On Friday, 18 September 2015 04:14:25 UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
>
> We at Julia Computing have done some exploratory work on ArrayFire.jl,
> which is now available here. This is not a supported package at the moment,
> but
We at Julia Computing have done some exploratory work on ArrayFire.jl,
which is now available here. This is not a supported package at the moment,
but that could change in the future. For now, we are putting out what we
have done.
https://github.com/JuliaComputing/ArrayFire.jl
-viral
On
I don't know anything about ArrayFire, but this seems potentially interesting.
Checking the code, it seems like you used the Cpp interface rather than what
appears to be an available C interface. Any particular reason? (As in, "don't
use the C interface, it doesn't work"?)
--Tim
On Friday,
Happy to see thus reaction from a core julia developer. Hope julia makes
parallel programming on CPUs and GPUs easier.
May be somehow we will be able to integrate this with Julia so well that we
will always have the first-mover advantage ;)
-zahir
On Monday, 17 November 2014 00:35:02 UTC-5, Viral Shah wrote:
Wow, I did not know about this. We certainly should leverage this. The API
looks easy to call too
I had the same response, great that they open-sourced the library, and
wrapping it in a Julia package would be interesting and not that hard to
do. It just needs someone to put a little bit of time into it. How long
have you been using Julia? Try compiling the arrayfire library and writing
a
thanks. I have been using Julia for five months or so. I have not used the
ccall function ever. I will try it out as soon as I am done my current
project.
On Friday, 14 November 2014 18:29:09 UTC-5, Tony Kelman wrote:
I had the same response, great that they open-sourced the library, and
