I'm thrilled. It worked! Thanks for the hint!
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 2:46:42 PM UTC+1, Scott T wrote:
>
> Try setting
>
> ENV["EDITOR"] = "atom"
>
> in .juliarc. This works for me on a linux system but you may need a
> different command name to launch atom on mac or windows.
>
>
> On
Try setting
ENV["EDITOR"] = "atom"
in .juliarc. This works for me on a linux system but you may need a
different command name to launch atom on mac or windows.
On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 12:16:36 UTC+1, chobb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I know @which, but not @edit. Thanks!
>
> Btw, I have a hard
I know @which, but not @edit. Thanks!
Btw, I have a hard time setting the default editor for Julia, following the
suggestion in the following thread.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/default$20editor/julia-users/00OlSKal6uY/7XjDuNnPMUAJ
Could you let me know the exact
great news ! thanks !
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 16:20:33 UTC+2, Steven G. Johnson a écrit :
>
>
>
> That debugger is mostly a stopgap/prototype until we have a "real"
> debugger based on LLDB, which allows you to run code at full speed until
> you hit a break point. Such a debugger was recently
On Monday, 25 April 2016 23:34:03 UTC+2, chobb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ... want to see which constructor is called for construction, if multiple
> constructors exist
>
^
Do you know the @which macro? E.g. @which DateTime(2016) or @which
DateTime("20151204"). To
Many thanks!
On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 10:39:08 PM UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> Yes, to all of the above.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:34 PM, wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot for the info.
>>
>> 1. I've been using Matlab debugger and gdb for fortran for many years.
>>
Yes, to all of the above.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:34 PM, wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the info.
>
> 1. I've been using Matlab debugger and gdb for fortran for many years.
> Will Gallium and AST Interpreter for Julia v5.0 give a comparable user
> experience? For example, I'm
Thanks a lot for the info.
1. I've been using Matlab debugger and gdb for fortran for many years. Will
Gallium and AST Interpreter for Julia v5.0 give a comparable user
experience? For example, I'm used to use debugger to step a code from line
1 through the end. Will Gallium and ASTI allow me
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:12 AM, wrote:
> Thanks for the reference. I quickly scanned the Readmes of Gallium and
> ASTInterpreter and found that they're probably too brief to start with. Is
> there a more complete documentation or tutorial? What is the relation
> between
Thanks for the reference. I quickly scanned the Readmes of Gallium and
ASTInterpreter and found that they're probably too brief to start with. Is
there a more complete documentation or tutorial? What is the relation
between Gallium and AST Interpreter?
BTW, do I have to wait until the release
On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-4, chobb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm using the Julia Debugger
>
> https://github.com/toivoh/Debug.jl
>
That debugger is mostly a stopgap/prototype until we have a "real" debugger
based on LLDB, which allows you to run code at full speed until you
Thanks.
I'm using the Julia Debugger
https://github.com/toivoh/Debug.jl
in a bash terminal.
Are there any other debuggers? I thought this is the only one and the de
facto official Julia debugger.
Thanks.
On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 2:52:17 PM UTC+1, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
>
> What
What debugger are you using?
13 matches
Mail list logo