[julia-users] Re: comparing compilation times for matlab and julia

2015-01-22 Thread Christian Peel
Viral, Thanks for the information about possible improvements in the future. Gray, if you look at the 'getAlgs' function in my code you'll see that I do include an alternate (but unused by default) way of encapsulating each algorithm in a function. This doesn't seem to improve the compilation

[julia-users] Re: comparing compilation times for matlab and julia

2015-01-20 Thread Viral Shah
With Jameson's work on static compilation and very early work towards interpreting Julia code, this will get addressed, but not in the near future. -viral On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Gray Calhoun wrote: > > Hi Christian, you can certainly make the code-writing process

[julia-users] Re: comparing compilation times for matlab and julia

2015-01-19 Thread Gray Calhoun
Hi Christian, you can certainly make the code-writing process much faster by splitting large functions into many distinct smaller functions. In your example (which I've only skimmed), `mimosimu` looks like it directly implements and annotates several similar but different algorithms which could all

[julia-users] Re: comparing compilation times for matlab and julia

2015-01-18 Thread Christian Peel
I guess the idea of automatic reloading of files after modification has been reviewed at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/265 and https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/julia-users/38pKvFP0ynM So instead of asking if it's possible to skip the 'include', I'll just add